xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update (July update)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:09:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140909140921.GF5435@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540EF2F802000078000328A0@mail.emea.novell.com>

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:30:48AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 09.09.14 at 11:53, <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > I've trimmed the CC list to just xen-devel and committers/maintainers
> > (mostly from the existing cc list, so not exhaustive).
> > 
> > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 16:45 -0400, konrad.wilk@oracle.com wrote:
> > 
> >> * Coding time: <=== NOW, one week left!
> >> 
> >> * Feature Freeze: 10th September 2014
> > 
> > I'm wondering if, with various maintainers and committers having been
> > away at various points over the summer (August in particular), we should
> > perhaps consider slipping the schedule a little bit.
> > 
> > I was away a fair bit myself and I still have a fairly large pile of
> > patches to wade through, many of which I consider important for 4.5[0].
> > I'm not sure how other maintainers feel about their respective areas.
> 
> A certain amount of slip would likely help me too, as would if the flood
> of patches (or revisions thereof) would start to decrease. I think we
> need to consider taking some measures to prevent everyone wanting
> to rush in their changes during the last couple of weeks before the
> freeze (irrespective of how long ago a first iteration may have been
> posted). I can only say that with the current situation (which I don't
> think was ever that bad), and with the need for me to do things other
> than patch reviewing, I'm not going to feel bad at all if some or all of
> those series miss 4.5 even if that's only because I didn't get to look at
> the n-th iteration thereof.

Hehe.

What is a comfortable amount of time for folks to feel that they can get
some code in?

Would a two week slippage be too little? Three weeks?
One month slippage scares me.

> 
> Jan
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-09 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-02 20:45 Xen 4.5 development update (July update) konrad.wilk
2014-09-02 21:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-03 10:09   ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-03 10:13     ` Wei Liu
2014-09-03 11:27     ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-03 11:53   ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2014-09-03 11:58     ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-03 19:54   ` Julien Grall
2014-09-09 14:04     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-03  1:17 ` Hongyang Yang
2014-09-03 12:05   ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2014-09-03  1:23 ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-09-03 12:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-03 15:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-03 15:53 ` Roy Franz
2014-09-09  9:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-09 10:30   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-09 14:09     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-09-09 14:30       ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-09 15:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-09 14:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-09 13:51 ` Meng Xu
2014-09-09 17:02   ` Dario Faggioli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-15 17:23 konrad.wilk
2014-08-15 17:58 ` Don Slutz
2014-08-15 19:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-15 19:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-15 21:19     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-16  0:31 ` Meng Xu
2014-08-20  9:53   ` Dario Faggioli
2014-08-20 13:40     ` Meng Xu
2014-08-19 16:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-08-21 19:17   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23  0:28 konrad.wilk
2014-07-23  0:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-23 16:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23  8:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-23  9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-23 10:20   ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 12:54     ` Don Slutz
2014-07-23 13:03       ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 18:34         ` Don Slutz
2014-07-24 11:21           ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 13:42     ` Fabio Fantoni
2014-07-23 13:45       ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 13:55         ` Fabio Fantoni
2014-07-23 17:02     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-24 11:23       ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-25 17:22         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23 16:18   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23 16:43     ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-28 17:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-08-04 15:44   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
     [not found] ` <1406569210.4038.28.camel@Solace>
     [not found]   ` <CAENZ-+=pABtLnOU1CE8nHYd48S0_pB4cggLz1zrqQq2V1pcA-w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-07-29  1:37     ` Meng Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140909140921.GF5435@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).