Re: [PING] various patches

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:06:40PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:19 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > "REST"-maintainers,
> > 
> > is there any chance I could gets acks or otherwise on
> > 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg01751.html
> 
> This looks like x86 rather than rest? In any case it seems like Andrew
> is looking into it, and if he is happy with it I think that should be
> sufficient for you to go ahead.

Except he is out for the next six days.
> 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02105.html
> 
> I don't see anything wrong with this, but I'm not sure if the reasons
> for Keir's original concerns have now gone away or the circumstances
> have changed etc.

Ditto, it looked OK to me but I needed to refresh on the possible
disadvantages of the r/w locks as compared to bytelocks.
> 
> > Also, does anyone have comments on the approach taken in
> > 
> > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-09/msg02103.html
> > 
> > (see namely the not to be committed part of the description)?
> 
> The bit about migration to an older hypervisor not working? I think you
> are right that we don't care to support that.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel