* Re: QEMU 2.0.2
[not found] <20140926161431.GA1742@perard.uk.xensource.com>
@ 2014-09-29 14:17 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2014-09-29 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony PERARD; +Cc: xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini
CC'ing xen-devel and Konrad.
I think I should go ahead and merge QEMU 2.0.2 on our current
qemu-xen-upstream branch, to get the bug fixes of the stable release (we
are now based on 2.0.0).
Konrad, do you agree?
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> I've tested the QEMU's stable release 2.0.2 and I did not spot any
> issue.
>
> I've tested migration and save/restore with Linux 3.14. I've also tested
> migration with winxp and win7 and it also works fine.
>
> There were no conflict when I did `git merge v2.0.2`. And here is the
> branch that I have tested:
>
> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/qemu-dm.git merge-2.0.2
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Anthony PERARD
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: QEMU 2.0.2
2014-09-29 14:17 ` QEMU 2.0.2 Stefano Stabellini
@ 2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-29 16:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2014-09-29 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: Anthony PERARD, xen-devel
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:17:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> CC'ing xen-devel and Konrad.
>
> I think I should go ahead and merge QEMU 2.0.2 on our current
> qemu-xen-upstream branch, to get the bug fixes of the stable release (we
> are now based on 2.0.0).
>
> Konrad, do you agree?
Yes, please.
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > I've tested the QEMU's stable release 2.0.2 and I did not spot any
> > issue.
> >
> > I've tested migration and save/restore with Linux 3.14. I've also tested
> > migration with winxp and win7 and it also works fine.
> >
> > There were no conflict when I did `git merge v2.0.2`. And here is the
> > branch that I have tested:
> >
> > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/qemu-dm.git merge-2.0.2
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Anthony PERARD
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: QEMU 2.0.2
2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2014-09-29 16:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2014-09-29 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: Anthony PERARD, xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:17:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > CC'ing xen-devel and Konrad.
> >
> > I think I should go ahead and merge QEMU 2.0.2 on our current
> > qemu-xen-upstream branch, to get the bug fixes of the stable release (we
> > are now based on 2.0.0).
> >
> > Konrad, do you agree?
>
> Yes, please.
Done.
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > > Hi Stefano,
> > >
> > > I've tested the QEMU's stable release 2.0.2 and I did not spot any
> > > issue.
> > >
> > > I've tested migration and save/restore with Linux 3.14. I've also tested
> > > migration with winxp and win7 and it also works fine.
> > >
> > > There were no conflict when I did `git merge v2.0.2`. And here is the
> > > branch that I have tested:
> > >
> > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/qemu-dm.git merge-2.0.2
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Anthony PERARD
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-29 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20140926161431.GA1742@perard.uk.xensource.com>
2014-09-29 14:17 ` QEMU 2.0.2 Stefano Stabellini
2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-29 16:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).