* Re: QEMU 2.0.2 [not found] <20140926161431.GA1742@perard.uk.xensource.com> @ 2014-09-29 14:17 ` Stefano Stabellini 2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2014-09-29 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony PERARD; +Cc: xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini CC'ing xen-devel and Konrad. I think I should go ahead and merge QEMU 2.0.2 on our current qemu-xen-upstream branch, to get the bug fixes of the stable release (we are now based on 2.0.0). Konrad, do you agree? On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Anthony PERARD wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > I've tested the QEMU's stable release 2.0.2 and I did not spot any > issue. > > I've tested migration and save/restore with Linux 3.14. I've also tested > migration with winxp and win7 and it also works fine. > > There were no conflict when I did `git merge v2.0.2`. And here is the > branch that I have tested: > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/qemu-dm.git merge-2.0.2 > > Regards, > > -- > Anthony PERARD > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: QEMU 2.0.2 2014-09-29 14:17 ` QEMU 2.0.2 Stefano Stabellini @ 2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2014-09-29 16:01 ` Stefano Stabellini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2014-09-29 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: Anthony PERARD, xen-devel On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:17:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > CC'ing xen-devel and Konrad. > > I think I should go ahead and merge QEMU 2.0.2 on our current > qemu-xen-upstream branch, to get the bug fixes of the stable release (we > are now based on 2.0.0). > > Konrad, do you agree? Yes, please. > > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > I've tested the QEMU's stable release 2.0.2 and I did not spot any > > issue. > > > > I've tested migration and save/restore with Linux 3.14. I've also tested > > migration with winxp and win7 and it also works fine. > > > > There were no conflict when I did `git merge v2.0.2`. And here is the > > branch that I have tested: > > > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/qemu-dm.git merge-2.0.2 > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Anthony PERARD > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: QEMU 2.0.2 2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2014-09-29 16:01 ` Stefano Stabellini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2014-09-29 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: Anthony PERARD, xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:17:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > CC'ing xen-devel and Konrad. > > > > I think I should go ahead and merge QEMU 2.0.2 on our current > > qemu-xen-upstream branch, to get the bug fixes of the stable release (we > > are now based on 2.0.0). > > > > Konrad, do you agree? > > Yes, please. Done. > > > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > > I've tested the QEMU's stable release 2.0.2 and I did not spot any > > > issue. > > > > > > I've tested migration and save/restore with Linux 3.14. I've also tested > > > migration with winxp and win7 and it also works fine. > > > > > > There were no conflict when I did `git merge v2.0.2`. And here is the > > > branch that I have tested: > > > > > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/qemu-dm.git merge-2.0.2 > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- > > > Anthony PERARD > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-29 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20140926161431.GA1742@perard.uk.xensource.com>
2014-09-29 14:17 ` QEMU 2.0.2 Stefano Stabellini
2014-09-29 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-29 16:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).