From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH for-xen-4.5] tools/mkrpm: improve version.release handling Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:16:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20141104101648.GA2296@aepfle.de> References: <1412694063-29616-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <20141103142436.GA23458@aepfle.de> <1415024987.24785.13.camel@citrix.com> <20141103144755.GA28870@aepfle.de> <1415095903.11486.9.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1415095903.11486.9.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Nov 04, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:47 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > Isn't that -ivh? -i installs multiple packages, if they have no overlapping files. -U replaces every installed version with the new one. > > -F installs whats already there. > Does rpm --force -Fvh not work? -F behaves different. I think it would not take --force into account. At least --oldpackage does not work with -F. Olaf