From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
Ian.Campbell@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] libxl: vcpuset: Check max_vcpus argument against the maximum number of vCPUs the guest has set.
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:45:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150203154547.GG9371@l.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21712.58639.482256.761520@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:11:11PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("[PATCH 2/4] libxl: vcpuset: Check max_vcpus argument against the maximum number of vCPUs the guest has set."):
> > The maximum number of VCPUs the guest can have is determined during
> > domain creation and is set by 'maxvcpus' parameter (in the guest
> > config). Trying to set the amount of vCPUs above said value
> > in vcpuset will result in an error - and we can catch it here
> > (instead of later in the function) and print a nice warning to the user.
> ...
> > + rc = libxl_domain_info(ctx, &dominfo, domid);
> > + if (rc == ERROR_INVAL) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Error: Domain %u does not exist.\n", domid);
> > + return -rc;
>
> Do we really return ERROR_INVAL for this ? ... Looks like we do.
>
> OK then, although we are definitely going to have to change that at
> some point. How tiresome.
I could add a new type - ERROR_NOTFOUND (of course as a seperate patch)
and change all of the libxl_domain_info users to take advantage of that
if you would like?
>
> Thanks,
> Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 13:33 [PATCH v1] Misc fixes to libxl (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-04 13:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] libxl: give pciback a chance to do its teardown before we reset the device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-05 10:58 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 17:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-05 17:56 ` Ian Jackson
2014-06-06 9:07 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-04 13:33 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] libxl: vcpu-set - allow to decrease vcpu count on overcommitted guests (v2) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-05 11:02 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 17:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-06 9:07 ` Ian Campbell
2015-02-02 20:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-02-02 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] libxl: vcpuset: Return error values Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-02-03 11:29 ` Ian Jackson
2015-02-02 20:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] libxl: vcpuset: Check max_vcpus argument against the maximum number of vCPUs the guest has set Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-02-03 15:11 ` Ian Jackson
2015-02-03 15:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2015-03-11 10:56 ` Ian Campbell
2015-02-02 20:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] libxl: vcpuset: Remove useless limit on max_vcpus Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-02-02 20:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] libxl: vcpu-set - allow to decrease vcpu count on overcommitted guests (v3) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150203154547.GG9371@l.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).