From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 76919: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:37:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106143746.GH27789@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452078861.7292.31.camel@citrix.com>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:14:21AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 76919 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/76919/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 66879
>
> ISTR someone (Wei?) at some point saying that a 32-bit stubdom (as used
> here) isn't actually something we wish to support. Shall we either drop
> this test altogether or mark it as allow? Or will someone investigate why
> it apparently can't find its disks.
>
Last time I looked at it I could only attributed such error to emulation
bug. To be honest the ROI of investigating this bug (and other yaks of
32bit stubdom) is very low so I would say let's mark it as allow.
Wei.
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/xen-unstable.html
>
> seems to suggest it has a very low probability of success (both merlot and
> italia failed dozens of times before passing)
>
> Nothing in the xen.git range bf925a9f1254..8e4d18e113c9 looks especially
> relevant.
>
> Bisection couldn't reproduce the basis pass:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable/test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.debian-hvm-install.html
>
> Ian.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-06 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 2:26 [xen-unstable test] 76919: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-01-06 11:14 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-06 11:19 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-06 14:37 ` Wei Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160106143746.GH27789@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).