From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 76919: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:37:46 +0000
Message-ID: <20160106143746.GH27789@citrix.com>
References: <osstest-76919-mainreport@xen.org>
	<1452078861.7292.31.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1452078861.7292.31.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:14:21AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 02:26 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 76919 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/76919/
> > =

> > Regressions :-(
> > =

> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > =A0test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-in=
stall fail REGR. vs. 66879
> =

> ISTR someone (Wei?) at some point saying that a 32-bit stubdom (as used
> here) isn't actually something we wish to support. Shall we either drop
> this test altogether or mark it as allow? Or will someone investigate why
> it apparently can't find its disks.
> =


Last time I looked at it I could only attributed such error to emulation
bug. To be honest the ROI of investigating this bug (and other yaks of
32bit stubdom) is very low so I would say let's mark it as allow.

Wei.

> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-i3=
86-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/xen-unstable.html
> =

> seems to suggest it has a very low probability of success (both merlot and
> italia failed dozens of times before passing)
> =

> Nothing in the xen.git range=A0bf925a9f1254..8e4d18e113c9 looks especially
> relevant.
> =

> Bisection couldn't reproduce the basis pass:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable/t=
est-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.debian-hvm-install.html
> =

> Ian.
> =