From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add support for vNVDIMM
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:47:10 +0800
Message-ID: <20160106154709.GF29472@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com>
References: <1451388711-18646-1-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
	<1452094671.21055.85.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1452094671.21055.85.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 01/06/16 15:37, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 19:31 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > This patch series is the Xen part patch to provide virtual NVDIMM to
> > guest. The corresponding QEMU patch series is sent separately with the
> > title "[PATCH 0/2] add vNVDIMM support for Xen".
> 
> When you send multiple related series like this please could you tag them
> in the 0/N subject line somehow as to the tree they are for. Either tagging
> with "[PATCH XEN 0/4]" (via git send-email --subject-prefix="PATCH XEN") or
> using something like "xen: add support for ..." (and the equivalent for
> other trees).
> 
> In this case I incorrectly categorised this based on the subject as a
> repost of a QEMU series I had seen just before and hence ignored it. I
> spotted a bit of diffstat in a reply and have now put it into my queue to
> look at, but that was pure luck.
> 
> Ian.

Sorry for the trouble. I'll add tags in new versions.

Haozhong