Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] xsplice: Implement payload loading (v2)

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

> >+static void find_hole(ssize_t pages, unsigned long *hole_start,
> >+                      unsigned long *hole_end)
> >+{
> >+    struct payload *data, *data2;
> >+
> >+    spin_lock(&payload_list_lock);
> >+    list_for_each_entry ( data, &payload_list, list )
> >+    {
> >+        list_for_each_entry ( data2, &payload_list, list )
> >+        {
> >+            unsigned long start, end;
> >+
> >+            start = (unsigned long)data2->payload_address;
> >+            end = start + data2->payload_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> >+            if ( *hole_end > start && *hole_start < end )
> >+            {
> >+                *hole_start = end;
> >+                *hole_end = *hole_start + pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> >+                break;
> >+            }
> >+        }
> >+        if ( &data2->list == &payload_list )
> >+            break;
> >+    }
> >+    spin_unlock(&payload_list_lock);
> >+}
> 
> This function above should go down into the CONFIG_X86 section below.

Odd. I have it in my tree. Ah right I - I had the patch not committed in. <sigh>
.. snip..
> >+int xsplice_elf_resolve_symbols(struct xsplice_elf *elf)
.. snip..
> >+int xsplice_elf_perform_relocs(struct xsplice_elf *elf)
.. snip..
> 
> Is there a reason the above two functions weren't put in the previous patch?

Historical. I will move them there. Thanks!
> 
> >diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> >index bd832df..4ea66bf 100644
> >--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> >+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> >@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@
> >
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_ARM_64)
> >  # define LONG_BYTEORDER 3
> >+# define ELFSIZE 64
> >  #else
> >  # define LONG_BYTEORDER 2
> >+# define ELFSIZE 32
> >  #endif
> 
> What does this do?

Make Elf_Note and all the ELf_* macros actually work.
> 
> (And perhaps it should also be in the previous patch since it's mentioned in
> the previous patch's changelog?)

I kind of lost where it was added. 

I could spin it out as a seperate patch - or make it part of the previous
patch? Thoughts?
> 
> -- 
> Ross Lagerwall