From: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2] xen: interface: introduce pvclk interface
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:35:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160121123534.GC29399@linux-7smt.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453379164.4320.30.camel@citrix.com>
Hi Ian,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:26:04PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 19:55 +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:19:32AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 16:59 +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> > >
>> > > To platform device of ARM, hypervisor is responsible for the mapping
>> > > between machine address and guest physical address, also responsible
>> > > for the irq mapping.
>> > >
>> > > But to embedded ARM SoC, the hardware clk IP is handled in Dom0.
>> >
>> > Arguably Xen ought to be the one to do this, but we have determined
>> > (rightly, I think) that doing so for the entirely clk tree of an SoC
>> > would
>> > involve importing an unmanageable amount of code into Xen[0].
>> >
>> > In the meantime we defer this to Dom0.
>> >
>> > I wonder though if it would be possible to manage the clocks for a
>> > passthrough device from the toolstack, i.e. is there a sysfs node where
>> > one
>> > can say "keep the clock for this device enabled (at xMhz) even though
>> > you
>> > think the device is unused"?
>>
>> I am afraid not. The linux device driver without xen can work well,
>> because
>> there is clk tree and "clk_get,clk_prepare,clk_set_rate" work well in the
>> driver.
>> I do not want to remove the clk apis usage from the device driver for
>> xen, because the driver
>> also serves when no xen support. The pvclk interface is mainly to let the
>> clk api can work as no xen.
>
>Would adding a dummy fixed-clock[0] (or several of them) to the guest
>passthrough DT satisfy the driver's requirements? They would be hardcoded
>to whatever rate dom0 and/or the tools has decided upon (and had set in the
>real h/w).
If using this way, we have the assumption that DomU device driver would not
change the rate of the clock driving the device. I am not sure whether this is
ok for so many platform devices based ARM core.
In /sys/kernel/debug/clk/...., there are clk tree info, but
clk api are not exposed to userspace as far as I know, so
if using sysfs interface to set a known fixed rate or enable/disable the clock,
we need to expose the clk info to userspace.
Jan said using hypercall in the other mail, do you have any ideas about this?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>Ian.
>
>[0] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-21 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 8:31 [RFC V2] xen: interface: introduce pvclk interface Peng Fan
2016-01-20 9:05 ` Juergen Gross
2016-01-20 9:25 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-20 10:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-20 10:40 ` Juergen Gross
2016-01-20 11:48 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-20 12:11 ` Juergen Gross
2016-01-20 14:13 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-20 10:14 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-20 11:40 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-20 12:01 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-20 14:05 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-20 14:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-20 14:37 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-20 14:49 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-21 1:29 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-21 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-21 8:59 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-21 10:19 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 11:55 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-21 12:26 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 12:35 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2016-01-21 12:49 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-22 2:19 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-23 15:26 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-21 12:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-01-21 13:11 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 16:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-01-22 2:51 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-21 10:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-21 12:06 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-21 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 1:56 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-22 7:36 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 9:27 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-22 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 12:12 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-22 12:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 13:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-01-20 12:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-01-20 12:27 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 13:52 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160121123534.GC29399@linux-7smt.suse \
--to=van.freenix@gmail.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).