From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/25] tools/libx{l, c}: introduce should_checkpoint callback Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:50:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20160126205032.GD27940@char.us.oracle.com> References: <1451443075-27428-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1451443075-27428-10-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1451443075-27428-10-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wen Congyang Cc: Lars Kurth , Changlong Xie , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Andrew Cooper , Jiang Yunhong , Ian Jackson , xen devel , Dong Eddie , Gui Jianfeng , Shriram Rajagopalan , Yang Hongyang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote: > Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this > callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint. So 1 means OK. > 0 indicates unexpected error. Why not return an error? > > Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang > Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang > --- > tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > tools/libxl/libxl_save_msgs_gen.pl | 7 ++++--- > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h b/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h > index bd133af..88d6e13 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h > +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h > @@ -62,6 +62,15 @@ struct save_callbacks { > * 1: take another checkpoint */ > int (*checkpoint)(void* data); > > + /* > + * Called after the checkpoint callback. > + * > + * returns: > + * 0: terminate checkpointing gracefully checkpointing terminated gracefully Why not return -EXX instead ? > + * 1: take another checkpoint