From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/HVM: rewrite the start info structure definition in binary form Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20160209082619.GD2818@var.home> References: <1454675320-29429-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <56B4AE1C02000078000CF06E@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <56B4C39E.50206@citrix.com> <56B9ADE502000078000CFDFC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aT3ct-0001Rm-VB for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:26:24 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56B9ADE502000078000CFDFC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jan Beulich, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 01:14:13 -0700, wrote: > >>> On 05.02.16 at 16:45, wrote: > > El 5/2/16 a les 14:13, Jan Beulich ha escrit: > >> But > >> even then - wouldn't what I've read on the other thread mean > >> at least the filename should be put there (as kind of the first > >> command line element)? > > > > Really? I didn't get that impression at all, what's the filename useful > > for anyway? > > This largely depends on whether you mean to mimic multiboot1 or > multiboot2. Remember the placeholder people have to add to > certain grub2 invocation lines? I think that's a result of their > attempt to had through a file name. Yes. For gnumach we've been adding the file name by hand in the command line. Otherwise the resulting tasks would have at best their first parameter as task name, since gnumach has no idea what these modules... Samuel