From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Haozhong Zhang Subject: Re: [RFC Design Doc] Add vNVDIMM support for Xen Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:42:27 +0800 Message-ID: <20160218074227.GC6519@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com> References: <20160201054414.GA25211@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com> <20160202191519.GB21656@char.us.oracle.com> <20160215084352.GB8938@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com> <56C1BF9302000078000D202D@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20160217090105.GD5459@hz-desktop.sh.intel.com> <56C4469C02000078000D2F64@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C4469C02000078000D2F64@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Juergen Gross , Kevin Tian , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Jun Nakajima , Xiao Guangrong , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/17/16 02:08, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.02.16 at 10:01, wrote: > > On 02/15/16 04:07, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 15.02.16 at 09:43, wrote: > >> > On 02/03/16 03:15, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> >> > Similarly to that in KVM/QEMU, enabling vNVDIMM in Xen is composed of > >> >> > three parts: > >> >> > (1) Guest clwb/clflushopt/pcommit enabling, > >> >> > (2) Memory mapping, and > >> >> > (3) Guest ACPI emulation. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> .. MCE? and vMCE? > >> >> > >> > > >> > NVDIMM can generate UCR errors like normal ram. Xen may handle them in a > >> > way similar to what mc_memerr_dhandler() does, with some differences in > >> > the data structure and the broken page offline parts: > >> > > >> > Broken NVDIMM pages should be marked as "offlined" so that Xen > >> > hypervisor can refuse further requests that map them to DomU. > >> > > >> > The real problem here is what data structure will be used to record > >> > information of NVDIMM pages. Because the size of NVDIMM is usually much > >> > larger than normal ram, using struct page_info for NVDIMM pages would > >> > occupy too much memory. > >> > >> I don't see how your alternative below would be less memory > >> hungry: Since guests have at least partial control of their GFN > >> space, a malicious guest could punch holes into the contiguous > >> GFN range that you appear to be thinking about, thus causing > >> arbitrary splitting of the control structure. > >> > > > > QEMU would always use MFN above guest normal ram and I/O holes for > > vNVDIMM. It would attempt to search in that space for a contiguous range > > that is large enough for that that vNVDIMM devices. Is guest able to > > punch holes in such GFN space? > > See XENMAPSPACE_* and their uses. > I think we can add following restrictions to avoid uses of XENMAPSPACE_* punching holes in GFNs of vNVDIMM: (1) For XENMAPSPACE_shared_info and _grant_table, never map idx in them to GFNs occupied by vNVDIMM. (2) For XENMAPSPACE_gmfn, _gmfn_range and _gmfn_foreign, (a) never map idx in them to GFNs occupied by vNVDIMM, and (b) never map idx corresponding to GFNs occupied by vNVDIMM Haozhong