From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:48:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20160219144841.GP25240@wotan.suse.de> References: <1455887316-9223-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <1455887316-9223-9-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <56C71704.9080404@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56C71704.9080404@suse.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Juergen Gross Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , bp@alien8.de, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 19/02/16 14:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > The current check is a super long winded way of asking if this > > is on lguest. The flags is used for legacy features, this is > > What about Xen pv-domU? I wouldn't expect those to have PV_SUPPORTED_RTC > set. Hrm, I see -- how do we check for that in a standard more clean way? Luis