xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Subject: Domctl and physdevop for passthrough (Was: Re: Stabilising some tools only HVMOPs?)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 16:05:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160219160539.GV3723@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160217172808.GB3723@citrix.com>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:28:08PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Tools people are in the process of splitting libxenctrl into a set of
> stable libraries. One of the proposed libraries is libxendevicemodel
> which has a collection of APIs that can be used by device model.
> 
> Currently we use QEMU as reference to extract symbols and go through
> them one by one. Along the way we discover QEMU is using some tools
> only HVMOPs.
> 
> The list of tools only HVMOPs used by QEMU are:
> 
>   #define HVMOP_track_dirty_vram    6
>   #define HVMOP_modified_memory    7
>   #define HVMOP_set_mem_type    8
>   #define HVMOP_inject_msi         16
>   #define HVMOP_create_ioreq_server 17
>   #define HVMOP_get_ioreq_server_info 18
>   #define HVMOP_map_io_range_to_ioreq_server 19
>   #define HVMOP_unmap_io_range_from_ioreq_server 20
>   #define HVMOP_destroy_ioreq_server 21
>   #define HVMOP_set_ioreq_server_state 22
> 

In the process of ploughing through QEMU symbols, there are some domctls
and physdevops used to do  passthrough. To make passthrough APIs in
libxendevicemodel we need to stabilise them as well. Can I use the same
trick __XEN_TOOLS_STABLE__ here? If not, what would be the preferred way
of doing this?

PASSTHRU
`xc_domain_bind_pt_pci_irq`     `XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq`    
`xc_domain_ioport_mapping`      `XEN_DOMCTL_ioport_mapping` 
`xc_domain_memory_mapping`      `XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping` 
`xc_domain_unbind_msi_irq`      `XEN_DOMCTL_unbind_pt_irq`  
`xc_domain_unbind_pt_irq`       `XEN_DOMCTL_unbind_pt_irq`  
`xc_domain_update_msi_irq`      `XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq`    
`xc_physdev_map_pirq`           `PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq`        
`xc_physdev_map_pirq_msi`       `PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq`        
`xc_physdev_unmap_pirq`         `PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq`      


Wei.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-19 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17 17:28 Stabilising some tools only HVMOPs? Wei Liu
2016-02-18 10:24 ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-18 10:37   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 10:45     ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 10:53       ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-18 10:55         ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 10:56       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 10:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 10:36   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 10:44   ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-18 10:55     ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 10:59       ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 11:04         ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:51 ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 16:28   ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-18 16:29     ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 16:41     ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 16:45       ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-18 16:49       ` Wei Liu
2016-02-18 16:37   ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-19 16:05 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-02-22 11:28   ` Domctl and physdevop for passthrough (Was: Re: Stabilising some tools only HVMOPs?) Jan Beulich
2016-02-22 11:56     ` Wei Liu
2016-02-23 14:31     ` Wei Liu
2016-02-23 15:46       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-23 17:09         ` Wei Liu
2016-02-23 17:24           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-23 17:28             ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-23 17:55             ` Wei Liu
2016-02-29 12:23       ` Wei Liu
2016-02-29 12:29         ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-29 18:12           ` Wei Liu
2016-03-01  7:54             ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-01 10:52               ` Wei Liu
2016-03-01 11:10                 ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160219160539.GV3723@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).