From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/13] tools/libxc: support to resume
 uncooperative HVM guests
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:21:01 +0000
Message-ID: <20160219172101.GX3723@citrix.com>
References: <1455763403-18641-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<1455763403-18641-6-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20160218121336.GG3723@citrix.com>
	<20160219141537.GD31079@localhost.localdomain>
	<20160219144350.GT3723@citrix.com>
	<1455893531.6225.106.camel@citrix.com>
	<20160219151627.GU3723@citrix.com>
	<20160219162007.GD31685@char.us.oracle.com>
	<20160219164220.GW3723@citrix.com>
	<20160219171631.GE11161@char.us.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160219171631.GE11161@char.us.oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>, Changlong Xie <xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>, Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@easystack.cn>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:16:31PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > .. forbid what? PVHVM resuming with fast=0? Why?  Because the guest may
> > > fall on its face?
> > 
> > Yes, forbid resuming PVHVM with fast=0 if we have no clear definition of
> > how it works. It's not because guest would fall, it's because we can't
> > tell which side (the guest or the toolstack) is buggy when the guest
> > falls.
> > 
> > But it looks like we (you ;-) ) have clear idea of how it works, we
> > (you) just need to write it down.
> 
> 
> Where? The header file where SHUTDOWN_suspend is introduced?
> 
> Or the libxc ones?

I have no opinion whether Xen public header should contain such text,
but I do wish to have better document for xc_domain_resume.  Basically
it is just turning what you wrote in this thread to comment for
xc_domain_resume.

Wei.