From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Sergei Lebedev <sergei.a.lebedev@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] xs.watch and xs.unwatch are unreliable
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:03:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302160338.GA23172@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834E88AE-F08A-415F-8C24-D4FDEFEB01B3@gmail.com>
I've CC'ed some people who might have an idea whether they are replying
on this behaviour. I doubt that but let's better be sure...
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:17:54PM +0300, Sergei Lebedev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I’ve initially wanted to report another inconsistency in ``xen.lowlevel.xs`` documentation, but this time the issue is more subtle.
>
> Both ``xs.watch`` and ``xs.unwatch`` accept two arguments: a path to watch and a token. According to the documentation, the second argument must be a string, which makes sense, since the token should be sent directly to XenStore. Instead of doing the simple thing (transmitting the token as-is), the implementation makes a new token from *the pointer* to the token object and sends it instead:
>
> PyObject *token;
> char token_str[MAX_STRLEN(unsigned long) + 1];
>
> snprintf(token_str, sizeof(token_str), "%li", (unsigned long)token);
>
> This does work for simple cases, e.g. if a token is a string literal
>
> >>> from xen.lowlevel.xs import xs
> >>> h = xs()
> >>> h.watch(“@introduceDomain”, “token”)
> >>> h.unwatch(“@introduceDomain”, “token”)
>
> or a small number
>
> >>> h.watch(“@introduceDomain”, 42)
> >>> h.unwatch(“@introduceDomain”, 42)
>
> But in the general case this is broken
>
> >>> h.watch("@introduceDomain", 100000000000000000000000000000)
> >>> h.unwatch("@introduceDomain", 100000000000000000000000000000)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> xen.lowlevel.xs.Error: (2, 'No such file or directory’)
>
> Here’s another example with a string token
>
> >>> token1 = str(100000000000000000000000000000)
> >>> token2 = str(100000000000000000000000000000)
> >>> token1 == token2
> True
> >>> h.watch("@introduceDomain", token1)
> >>> h.unwatch("@introduceDomain", token2)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> xen.lowlevel.xs.Error: (2, 'No such file or directory’)
>
> I’m not sure what would be the best way to handle this as there might be existing code relying on this undocumented behaviour. What do you think?
>
In any case this looks like a real bug.
The fix (as you said) is to transmit the token. I don't think your
proposed fix would break existing users though.
Wei.
> Regards,
> Sergei
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 20:17 [BUG] xs.watch and xs.unwatch are unreliable Sergei Lebedev
2016-03-02 16:03 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-03-03 16:47 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-03 17:02 ` Wei Liu
2016-03-03 17:18 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-03 18:57 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160302160338.GA23172@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=sergei.a.lebedev@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).