From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/28] xen/x86: Generate deep dependencies of features
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:32:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160317203229.GA6610@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EB103C.2000607@citrix.com>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:14:52PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/03/16 19:45, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:35:06PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> Some features depend on other features. Working out and maintaining the exact
> >> dependency tree is complicated, so it is expressed in the automatic generation
> >> script, and flattened for faster runtime use.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> >> ---
> >> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> * Vastly more reserch and comments
> >> v2:
> >> * New
> >> ---
> >> xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++
> >> xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h | 2 +
> >> xen/tools/gen-cpuid.py | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 3 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c
> >> index 174cfa0..17487f5 100644
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c
> >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ const uint32_t special_features[] = INIT_SPECIAL_FEATURES;
> >> static const uint32_t __initconst pv_featuremask[] = INIT_PV_FEATURES;
> >> static const uint32_t __initconst hvm_shadow_featuremask[] = INIT_HVM_SHADOW_FEATURES;
> >> static const uint32_t __initconst hvm_hap_featuremask[] = INIT_HVM_HAP_FEATURES;
> >> +static const uint32_t __initconst deep_features[] = INIT_DEEP_FEATURES;
> >>
> >> uint32_t __read_mostly raw_featureset[FSCAPINTS];
> >> uint32_t __read_mostly pv_featureset[FSCAPINTS];
> >> @@ -18,12 +19,34 @@ uint32_t __read_mostly hvm_featureset[FSCAPINTS];
> >>
> >> static void __init sanitise_featureset(uint32_t *fs)
> >> {
> >> + uint32_t disabled_features[FSCAPINTS];
> >> unsigned int i;
> >>
> >> for ( i = 0; i < FSCAPINTS; ++i )
> >> {
> >> /* Clamp to known mask. */
> >> fs[i] &= known_features[i];
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Identify which features with deep dependencies have been
> >> + * disabled.
> >> + */
> >> + disabled_features[i] = ~fs[i] & deep_features[i];
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + for_each_set_bit(i, (void *)disabled_features,
> >> + sizeof(disabled_features) * 8)
> >> + {
> >> + const uint32_t *dfs = lookup_deep_deps(i);
> >> + unsigned int j;
> >> +
> >> + ASSERT(dfs); /* deep_features[] should guarentee this. */
> >> +
> >> + for ( j = 0; j < FSCAPINTS; ++j )
> >> + {
> >> + fs[j] &= ~dfs[j];
> >> + disabled_features[j] &= ~dfs[j];
> > What if this clears the entries you have already skipped over?
>
> That is fine.
>
> >
> > Say you are at word 2 (i==2)and disabled_features[j] cleared word 1.
> > The loop (for_each_set_bit) won't notice this.
> >
> > And furthermore lets assume that the clearing of a bit in
> > word 1 should have done another dependency check which would clear
> > something at word 7. You would miss that?
>
> Each individual dfs[] is the complete set of all eventual features
> cleared because of i, which means there is no need to recurse along i's
> dependency chain.
In retrospective it is obvious - as the commit description says that.
What I was wondering if you could express what you said in the commit
description, like:
"We do take into account an feature which depends on a feature
which depends on a feature, and so. The individual dfs[] is the complete
set of _ALL_ eventual features cleared. "
>
> The entire point of the dependency flattening logic below is to make
> this logic here easier.
>
> >
> >> + # instructions. MMX is documented to alias the %MM registers over the
> >> + # x87 %ST registers in hardware.
> >> + FPU: [MMX],
> >> +
> >> + # The PSE36 feature indicates that reserved bits in a PSE superpage
> >> + # may be used as extra physical address bits.
> >> + PSE: [PSE36],
> >> +
> >> + # Entering Long Mode requires that %CR4.PAE is set. The NX pagetable
> >> + # bit is only representable in the 64bit PTE format offered by PAE.
> >> + PAE: [LM, NX],
> >> +
> >> + # APIC is special, but X2APIC does depend on APIC being available in
> >> + # the first place.
> >> + APIC: [X2APIC],
> >> +
> >> + # AMD built MMXExtentions and 3DNow as extentions to MMX.
> >> + MMX: [MMXEXT, _3DNOW]
> > EWhy the underscore?
>
> Because omitting it would be a syntax error. One slight hitch with
> mutating the global namespace is that is perfectly easy to put items in
> it which can be referred back to.
>
> ~Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-17 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 15:34 [PATCH RFC v3 00/28] x86: Improvements to cpuid handling for guests Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] xen/x86: Drop unused and non-useful feature definitions Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 7:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-16 9:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-22 14:06 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-03-22 14:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] xen/x86: Rename features to be closer to the vendor definitions Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 8:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-17 19:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] xen/public: Export cpu featureset information in the public API Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 8:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-22 10:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-18 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] xen/x86: Script to automatically process featureset information Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 8:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] xen/x86: Collect more cpuid feature leaves Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 8:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] xen/x86: Mask out unknown features from Xen's capabilities Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] xen/x86: Annotate special features Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-18 16:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] xen/x86: Annotate VM applicability in featureset Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-18 16:57 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-18 18:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-21 13:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] xen/x86: Calculate maximum host and guest featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-18 17:09 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-22 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 14:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-22 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 15:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-22 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] xen/x86: Generate deep dependencies of features Andrew Cooper
2016-03-17 19:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-17 20:14 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-17 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2016-03-21 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] xen/x86: Clear dependent features when clearing a cpu cap Andrew Cooper
2016-03-17 19:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-17 19:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-28 15:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-21 15:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] xen/x86: Improve disabling of features which have dependencies Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] xen/x86: Improvements to in-hypervisor cpuid sanity checks Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 16:11 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 15:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] x86/cpu: Move set_cpumask() calls into c_early_init() Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 16:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] x86/cpu: Sysctl and common infrastructure for levelling context switching Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 17:35 ` Joao Martins
2016-03-15 19:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 19:34 ` Joao Martins
2016-03-21 16:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 15:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-22 16:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] x86/cpu: Rework AMD masking MSR setup Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 16:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-21 16:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] x86/cpu: Rework Intel masking/faulting setup Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 16:44 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] x86/cpu: Context switch cpuid masks and faulting state in context_switch() Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] x86/pv: Provide custom cpumasks for PV domains Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 16:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] x86/domctl: Update PV domain cpumasks when setting cpuid policy Andrew Cooper
2016-03-21 17:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 16:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-22 16:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] xen+tools: Export maximum host and guest cpu featuresets via SYSCTL Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:23 ` Wei Liu
2016-03-16 20:38 ` David Scott
2016-03-22 8:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-22 20:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] tools/libxc: Modify bitmap operations to take void pointers Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 15:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-03-17 12:17 ` Wei Liu
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] tools/libxc: Use public/featureset.h for cpuid policy generation Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] tools/libxc: Expose the automatically generated cpu featuremask information Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] tools: Utility for dealing with featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:23 ` Wei Liu
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] tools/libxc: Wire a featureset through to cpuid policy logic Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] tools/libxc: Use featuresets rather than guesswork Andrew Cooper
2016-03-15 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] tools/libxc: Calculate xstate cpuid leaf from guest information Andrew Cooper
2016-03-16 18:23 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160317203229.GA6610@localhost.localdomain \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).