From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: [RFC] Hypervisor, x86 emulation deprivileged
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:22:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160705112227.GA1729@perard.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've taken over the work from Ben to have a deprivileged mode in the
hypervisor, but I'm unsure about which direction to take.
First, after understanding what have been done, and fixing a few things,
I did some benchmark to compare a simple "device" running in ring0 to
the same one running in ring3 and also in QEMU. This "device" would call
'rdtsc' on 'outl' and return the value in 'inl' (I actually do not use
the value). The measurement is done from a kernel module in the guest
(simply rdtsc;inl;rdtsc multiple time). This is the result I've found:
ring3 ~3.5x slower than ring0
qemu ~22x slower than ring0
~6.5x slower than ring3
So that would be the worst-case scenario, where an emulator barely do
anything.
There have been different methods proposed to do the depriv mode, in
<55A8D477.2060909@citrix.com>, one of which was to implement a per-vcpu
stack which could be more elegant.
So, would you suggest that I start working on a per-vcpu stack? Or
should I continue with the current direction?
Some of the code I have, including the code for the benchmark, can be
found here:
git://xenbits.xen.org/people/aperard/xen-unstable.git
branch: hvm-x86-deprivileged-mode-wip
Regards,
--
Anthony PERARD
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-05 11:22 Anthony PERARD [this message]
2016-07-05 12:58 ` [RFC] Hypervisor, x86 emulation deprivileged George Dunlap
2016-07-05 17:20 ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-05 13:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-07-05 17:01 ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-05 17:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-06 7:59 ` Paul Durrant
2016-07-08 9:07 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160705112227.GA1729@perard.uk.xensource.com \
--to=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).