From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: update vcpus bitmap in retrieved guest config
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:31:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711113143.GG7019@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22399.59004.935094.420724@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:44:28PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: update vcpus bitmap in retrieved guest config"):
> > ... because the available vcpu bitmap can change during domain life time
> > due to cpu hotplug and unplug.
> >
> > For QEMU upstream, we interrogate QEMU for the number of vcpus. For
> > others, we look directly into xenstore for information.
> ...
> > +static int libxl__update_avail_vcpus_qmp(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> > + unsigned int max_vcpus,
> > + libxl_bitmap *map)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* For QEMU upstream we always need to return the number
> > + * of cpus present to QEMU whether they are online or not;
> > + * otherwise QEMU won't accept the saved state.
>
> This comment is confusing to me. Perhaps `return' should read
> `provide' ? But the connection between the body of this function and
> the comment is still obscure.
>
"provide" is ok.
To avoid confusion the comment can be moved a few line above to describe
the function, not the code snippet. Does that work better?
> > +static int libxl__update_avail_vcpus_xenstore(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> > + unsigned int max_vcpus,
> > + libxl_bitmap *map)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + const char *dompath;
> ...
> > + for (i = 0; i < max_vcpus; i++) {
> > + const char *path = GCSPRINTF("%s/cpu/%u/availability", dompath, i);
> > + const char *content = libxl__xs_read(gc, XBT_NULL, path);
> > + if (!strcmp(content, "online"))
> > + libxl_bitmap_set(map, i);
>
> Firstly, this should be libxl__xs_read_checked. Secondly if "content"
> is NULL, this will crash.
>
Will fix.
> > @@ -7294,6 +7341,55 @@ int libxl_retrieve_domain_configuration(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
> > libxl_dominfo_dispose(&info);
> > }
> >
> > + /* VCPUs */
> > + {
> > + libxl_bitmap *map = &d_config->b_info.avail_vcpus;
> > + unsigned int max_vcpus = d_config->b_info.max_vcpus;
> > + libxl_device_model_version version;
> > +
> > + libxl_bitmap_dispose(map);
> > + libxl_bitmap_init(map);
> > + libxl_bitmap_alloc(CTX, map, max_vcpus);
> > + libxl_bitmap_set_none(map);
>
> I see that this function already trashes the domain config when it
> fails (leaving it up to the caller to free the partial config) but
> that this is not documented :-/.
d_config is an out parameter. User can't expect the returned d_config to
be valid if this API returns error state. And user is still responsible
for calling _init before calling this API and _dispose afterwards. So
this still fits into how we expect libxl types to be used. Nothing new
needs to be documented.
All other fields are already handled in this way.
>
> > + /* If the user did not explicitly specify a device model
> > + * version, we need to use the same logic used during domain
> > + * creation to derive the device model version.
> > + */
> > + version = d_config->b_info.device_model_version;
> > + if (version == LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_UNKNOWN)
> > + version = libxl__get_device_model_version(gc, &d_config->b_info);
>
> I think this is rather unfortunate. Won't changing the default device
> model while the domain is running will cause this function to give
> wrong answers ?
I think saving the device model into the template should work. No need
to derive it during runtime.
Wei.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-15 9:31 [PATCH v3 0/5] libxl: libxl: update available vcpus map in retrieve configuration function Wei Liu
2016-06-15 9:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] libxl: libxl_domain_need_memory shouldn't modify b_info Wei Liu
2016-06-15 13:31 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 13:38 ` Wei Liu
2016-07-08 17:35 ` Ian Jackson
2016-07-11 11:03 ` Wei Liu
2016-06-15 9:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] libxl: factor out libxl__get_device_modlel_version Wei Liu
2016-06-15 13:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 17:04 ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-08 17:37 ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-15 9:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] libxl: introduce libxl__qmp_query_cpus Wei Liu
2016-06-15 13:26 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 16:48 ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-08 17:45 ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-15 9:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: update vcpus bitmap in retrieved guest config Wei Liu
2016-06-15 17:20 ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-08 17:44 ` Ian Jackson
2016-07-11 11:31 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-07-11 14:59 ` Wei Liu
2016-06-15 9:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] libxl: only issue cpu-add call to QEMU for not present CPU Wei Liu
2016-07-08 17:48 ` Ian Jackson
2016-07-11 11:32 ` Wei Liu
2016-07-02 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] libxl: libxl: update available vcpus map in retrieve configuration function Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160711113143.GG7019@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).