xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: StefanoStabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: Device model operation hypercall (DMOP, re qemu depriv)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:38:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802113808.GG22419@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <579F5F900200007800101468@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 06:41:20AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.08.16 at 13:32, <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > 4. We could invent a new hypercall `DMOP' for hypercalls which device
> >    models should be able to use, which always has the target domain in
> >    a fixed location in the arguments.  We have the dom0 privcmd driver
> >    know about this one hypercall number and the location of the target
> >    domid.
> > 
> > Option 4 has the following advantages:
> > 
> > * The specification of which hypercalls are authorised to qemu is
> >   integrated with the specification of the hypercalls themselves:
> >   There is no need to maintain a separate table which can get out of
> >   step (or contain security bugs).
> > 
> > * The changes required to the rest of the system are fairly small.
> >   In particular:
> > 
> > * We need only one small, non-varying, patch to the dom0 kernel.
> > 
> > 
> > Let me flesh out option 4 in more detail:
> > 
> > 
> > We define a new hypercall DMOP.
> > 
> > Its first argument is always a target domid.  The DMOP hypercall
> > number and position of the target domid in the arguments are fixed.
> > 
> > A DMOP is defined to never put at risk the stability or security of
> > the whole system, nor of the domain which calls DMOP.  However, a DMOP
> > may have arbitrary effects on the target domid.
> 
> With the exception of this and the privcmd layer described below,
> DMOP == HVMCTL afaics. The privcmd layer is independent anyway.
> And the security aspect mentioned above won't disappear if we
> use DMOP instead of HVMCTL. So I don't see why the hvmctl
> series as is can't be the starting point of this, with the stability/
> security concerns addressed subsequently, for being orthogonal.
> 

Yeah, to turn HVMCTL to DMOP:

1. s/HVMCTL/DMOP/
2. maybe s/interface_version//

I think we could at least do #1 and merge the series.

Wei.

> Jan
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-28 17:01 XenProject/XenServer QEMU working group, Friday 8th July, 2016, 15:00 Jennifer Herbert
2016-08-01 11:32 ` Device model operation hypercall (DMOP, re qemu depriv) Ian Jackson
2016-08-01 12:41   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-02 11:38     ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-08-02 11:58       ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-02 13:02         ` David Vrabel
2016-08-02 13:29           ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-03 10:29       ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-03 12:03         ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-03 13:37           ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-03 14:16             ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-03 14:21               ` George Dunlap
2016-08-03 16:10                 ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-03 16:18                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-04 11:21                     ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-04 13:24                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-05 16:28                         ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-08 11:18                           ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-08 13:46                             ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-08 14:07                               ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-26 11:38                                 ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-26 12:58                                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-26 14:35                                     ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-26 15:13                                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-30 11:02                                         ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-30 21:47                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-02 14:08                                           ` Wei Liu
2016-08-09 10:29                               ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-09 10:48                                 ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-09 11:30                                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-12  9:44                                     ` George Dunlap
2016-08-12 11:50                                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-15  9:39                                         ` George Dunlap
2016-08-15 10:19                                           ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-15 10:47                                             ` George Dunlap
2016-08-15 11:20                                               ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-15 12:07                                                 ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-15 14:20                                                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-15 14:57                                                 ` George Dunlap
2016-08-15 15:22                                                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-15 14:50                                 ` David Vrabel
2016-08-15 15:24                                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-26 11:29                                     ` Ian Jackson
2016-08-26 12:58                                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-02 11:37   ` Wei Liu
2016-08-02 11:42     ` George Dunlap
2016-08-02 12:34       ` Wei Liu
2016-09-09 15:16   ` Jennifer Herbert
2016-09-09 15:34     ` David Vrabel
2016-09-12 13:47     ` George Dunlap
2016-09-12 14:32     ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-13 10:37       ` George Dunlap
2016-09-13 11:53         ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-13 16:07       ` David Vrabel
2016-09-14  9:51         ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-21 11:21           ` Ian Jackson
2016-09-21 11:28             ` George Dunlap
2016-09-21 11:58               ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-21 11:55             ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-21 12:23               ` Device model operation hypercall (DMOP, re qemu depriv) [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2016-09-21 12:48                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-21 13:24                   ` Ian Jackson
2016-09-21 13:56                     ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-21 15:06                       ` Ian Jackson
2016-09-21 17:09                       ` George Dunlap
2016-09-22  8:47                         ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-09 16:18 ` XenProject/XenServer QEMU working group minutes, 30th August 2016 Jennifer Herbert
2016-09-12  7:16   ` Juergen Gross
2016-10-14 18:01   ` QEMU XenServer/XenProject Working group meeting 29th September 2016 Jennifer Herbert
2016-10-18 19:54     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-10-20 17:37       ` Lars Kurth
2016-10-20 18:53         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-02-28 18:18     ` QEMU XenServer/XenProject Working group meeting 10th February 2017 Jennifer Herbert
2017-06-05 13:48       ` QEMU XenServer/XenProject Working group meeting 10th May 2017 Jennifer Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160802113808.GG22419@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).