From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 100789: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:43:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908094359.GA13498@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <osstest-100789-mainreport@xen.org>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:32:00AM +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 100789 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100789/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 100773
[...]
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 100773
>
Andrew pointed out IRL that these two regressions are unfortunate side
effect of deleting blktap2. In short, the vhd-util used in these tests
comes from Xen's blktap2. :-/
I see three ways to move this forward.
1. Resurrect vhd-util from blktap2.
2. Install blktap-utils shipped in Debian (available from Wheezy
onwards), the main difficulty would be the package depends on a dkms
package that seems to require building with kernel header when
installing.
3. Retire these two tests.
In the meantime, if we want to avoid blocking xen-unstable for too long,
we might want to force push.
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-08 5:32 [xen-unstable test] 100789: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-09-08 9:43 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-09-08 9:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-09-08 14:23 ` [xen-unstable test] 100789: regressions - FAIL [and 2 more messages] Ian Jackson
2016-09-08 15:17 ` Wei Liu
2016-09-08 12:58 ` [xen-unstable test] 100789: regressions - FAIL Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160908094359.GA13498@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).