Re: [xen-unstable test] 100789: regressions - FAIL

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:43:59AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:32:00AM +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 100789 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100789/
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd  9 debian-di-install        fail REGR. vs. 100773
> [...]
> >  test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd       9 debian-di-install        fail REGR. vs. 100773
> > 
> 
> Andrew pointed out IRL that these two regressions are unfortunate side
> effect of deleting blktap2. In short, the vhd-util used in these tests
> comes from Xen's blktap2. :-/
> 
> I see three ways to move this forward.
> 
> 1. Resurrect vhd-util from blktap2.
> 2. Install blktap-utils shipped in Debian (available from Wheezy
>    onwards), the main difficulty would be the package depends on a dkms
>    package that seems to require building with kernel header when
>    installing.
> 3. Retire these two tests.
> 

4. Provide a pre-made vhd image.

vhd-util create disk.vhd -s 10000 -> 24K in actual size.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel