xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
	George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, jinsong.liu@alibaba-inc.com,
	dario.faggioli@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	jbeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] xen: move TLB-flush filtering out into populate_physmap during vm creation
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:23:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160921112356.GF30319@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70c53411-bf97-4f4e-a0e2-9becfb1b2269@default>

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:39:32PM -0700, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> > > This patch implemented parts of TODO left in commit id
> > > a902c12ee45fc9389eb8fe54eeddaf267a555c58 (More efficient TLB-flush
> > > filtering in alloc_heap_pages()). It moved TLB-flush filtering out into
> > > populate_physmap. Because of TLB-flush in alloc_heap_pages, it's very slow
> > > to create a guest with memory size of more than 100GB on host with 100+
> > > cpus.
> > >
> > >
> > Do you have some actual numbers on how much faster after applying this
> > patch?
> > 
> > This is mostly for writing release note etc, so it is fine if you don't
> > have numbers at hand.
> 
> I do not have data of upstream version at hand now.  I always tested the
> performance of this patchset by backporting it to an Oracle VM based on a
> very old Xen version, before I sent out the patchset for review. The
> backport just involves: (1) copy & paste code, (2) change bool to bool_t
> and (3) change true/false to 1/0.
> 
> The test machine has 8 nodes of 2048GB memory and 128 cpu. With this
> patchset applied, the time to re-create a VM (with 135GB memory and 12
> vcpu) is reduced from 5min to 20s.

Thanks, this is useful information.

Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-21 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-21  1:39 [PATCH v6 2/2] xen: move TLB-flush filtering out into populate_physmap during vm creation Dongli Zhang
2016-09-21 11:23 ` Wei Liu [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-20  2:31 [PATCH v6 1/2] xen: replace tlbflush check and operation with inline functions Dongli Zhang
2016-09-20  2:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] xen: move TLB-flush filtering out into populate_physmap during vm creation Dongli Zhang
2016-09-20  9:01   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-20 11:20   ` George Dunlap
2016-09-20 12:14     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20 14:54   ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160921112356.GF30319@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jinsong.liu@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).