From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>, WeiLiu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Regression between Xen 4.6.0 and 4.7.0, Direct kernel boot on a qemu-xen and seabios HVM guest doesn't work anymore.
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:24:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161025112412.GV30231@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161018124823.GM23219@citrix.com>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > Thursday, October 13, 2016, 4:43:31 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jan / Wei,
> >
> > > Took a while before i had the chance to fiddle some more to find the actual culprit.
> > > After analyzing the output of xl -vvvvv create somewhat more i came to the
> > > insight it was probably Qemu and not Xen causing the fault.
> >
> > > As a test I just used a qemu-xen binary build with xen-4.6.0 booting up a guest with
> > > direct kernel boot mode on xen-unstable. And that old qemu binary works fine.
> >
> > > After testing i can conclude, Jan was right, the bisection was a red herring,
> > > the problem is caused by some change in Qemu and not by something in the Xen tree.
> > > (strange thing is that for as far as i know i did a "make distclean" between
> > > every build (taking a lot of time), which should have pulled a fresh qemu-xen
> > > tree and therefor the bisection should have lead to a commit with a Config.mk
> > > hash change for qemu-xen version.)
> >
> > > Will see if i can find some more time and bisect qemu and find the culprit.
> >
> > > --
> > > Sander
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately i have to give up on this issue, for me it's impossible to bisect this
> > issue with my present git-foo.
> >
> > The first try with bisection of the whole xen-tree seems to have hit the issue that the
> > qemu-revision that gets pulled on a fresh build is "master" during the whole
> > dev period. That creates havoc when trying to bisect, since you are testing
> > combinations that were never developed (nor auto tested) in that combination
> > (especially when a xen-tree and qemu-tree change have a dependency like Roger's
> > "xen: fix usage of xc_domain_create in domain builder")
> >
> > While trying to bisect only qemu (keeping xen itself on RELEASE-4.6.0 and
> > seabios on rel-1.8.2) it get stuck on issues with that tree.
> > Between 4.6.0 and 4.7.0 the qemu tree switched from git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-upstream-4.6-testing.git
> > to git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git),after that there seem to have
> > been a lot of merges going back and forth and to me it seems a mess (but as i
> > said it could also be a lack of git-foo). I tried by manual bisecting, removing
> > and cloning trees again etc. but that doesn't suffice, it's all going no-where.
> > (while the known good build (plain RELEASE-4.6.0) always works, so it doesn't
> > seem to be some random problem)
> >
>
> Thanks for trying.
>
> > So perhaps some dev can at least verify that the issue is there (since 4.7.0)
> > and put it on the "known broken" list of things.
> >
>
> I will put this into the list of things I need to look at.
>
I investigated this a bit. The root cause is the memory accounting is
wrong in QEMU. It would try to allocate more ram than allowed. I haven't
tried to figure out exactly what is wrong, though.
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-25 20:21 Regression between Xen 4.6.0 and 4.7.0, Direct kernel boot on a qemu-xen and seabios HVM guest doesn't work anymore linux
2016-08-25 20:34 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-08-25 21:18 ` linux
2016-08-26 10:19 ` Håkon Alstadheim
2016-08-30 12:35 ` Wei Liu
2016-08-30 22:13 ` Håkon Alstadheim
2016-09-05 9:20 ` linux
2016-09-05 9:25 ` Wei Liu
2016-09-05 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 10:02 ` linux
2016-09-05 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 11:19 ` linux
2016-09-05 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05 12:00 ` linux
2016-10-13 14:43 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-17 15:28 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-18 12:48 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-18 21:32 ` Håkon Alstadheim
2016-10-25 11:24 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-10-25 11:37 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-25 14:49 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-25 15:00 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-25 17:25 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-10-25 17:26 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161025112412.GV30231@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).