From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Kelly <Kelly.Zytaruk@amd.com>,
"Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com>,
PaulDurrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:19:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161110171940.GB12805@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5824B04F020000780011DC1D@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:37:19AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.11.16 at 11:39, <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:45:17PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:59:12PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> > PCI memory BARs
> >> > ---------------
> >> >
> >> > PCI devices discovered by Xen will have it's BARs scanned in order to detect
> >> > memory BARs, and those will be identity mapped to Dom0. Since BARs can be
> >> > freely moved by the Dom0 OS by writing to the appropriate PCI config space
> >> > register, Xen must trap those accesses and unmap the previous region and
> >> > map the new one as set by Dom0.
> >>
> >> You can make that simpler - we have hypercalls to "notify" in Linux
> >> when a device is changing. Those can provide that information as well.
> >> (This is what PV dom0 does).
> >>
> >> Also you are missing one important part - the MMCFG. That is required
> >> for Xen to be able to poke at the PCI configuration spaces (above the 256).
> >> And you can only get the MMCFG if the ACPI DSDT has been parsed.
> >
> > Hm, I guess I'm missing something, but at least on my hardware Xen seems to
> > be able to parse the MCFG ACPI table before Dom0 does anything with the
> > DSDT:
> >
> > (XEN) PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f8000000 segment 0000 buses 00 - 3f
> > (XEN) PCI: MCFG area at f8000000 reserved in E820
>
> This is the crucial line: To guard against broken firmware, we - just
> like Linux - require that the area be reserved in at least one of E820
> or ACPI resources. We can check E820 ourselves, but we need
> Dom0's AML parser for the other mechanism.
And in fact I do have such box!
When it boots:
(XEN) PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0000 buses 00 - 3f^M^M
(XEN) PCI: Not using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f^M^M
.. and then later:
[ 3.880750] NetLabel: unlabeled traffic allowed by default^M^M^M
(XEN) PCI: Using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f^M^M
(when it gets the hypercall)
This is Intel DQ67SW with SWQ6710H.86A.0066.2012.1105.1504 BIOS
It is an SandyBridge motherboard.
>
> >> So if you do the PCI bus scanning _before_ booting PVH dom0, you may
> >> need to update your view of PCI devices after the MMCFG locations
> >> have been provided to you.
> >
> > I'm not opposed to keep the PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved, but I still have
> > to see hardware where this is actually needed. Also, AFAICT, FreeBSD at
Here is the spec:
ttp://ark.intel.com/products/51997/Intel-Desktop-Board-DQ67SW
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-09 15:59 [DRAFT RFC] PVHv2 interaction with physical devices Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-09 18:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-11-10 10:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-10 13:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-11-10 15:20 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-10 17:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-11-11 10:04 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-16 16:49 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-17 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-10 16:37 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-10 17:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2016-11-16 16:42 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-17 10:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-09 18:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-09 20:47 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2016-11-10 10:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-10 10:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-10 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161110171940.GB12805@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Kelly.Zytaruk@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).