From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] x86: re-add stack alignment check
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:12:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161125131230.GC11640@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c5519e6-dacf-bb51-969a-500bc5095e2f@citrix.com>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:34:30AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/11/16 10:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 15.11.16 at 11:46, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 15.11.16 at 11:26, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>> Everything will indeed break if it is off by 8, but everything will also
> >>> be similarly-broken if it is off by 16 or off by -8.
> >> Off by -8 will be caught as well. And there's no possible off-by-16,
> >> as then the calculations will be right again (read: you can freely
> >> add two longs to struct cpu_info, but you mustn't add just one).
> > This discussion appears to have stalled, and so far I've seen no
> > reason to change other than the position of the checks. I'm
> > hesitant to send out v2 though without having reached agreement
> > on the other aspects.
>
> Fine - lets get this fix back in for 4.8, then argue over how it should
> be improved.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-25 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 13:25 [PATCH] x86: re-add stack alignment check Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 13:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-14 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 14:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 14:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-14 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-14 16:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-14 16:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-15 10:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-15 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 10:14 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2016-11-25 10:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-25 13:12 ` Wei Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161125131230.GC11640@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).