xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] livepatch: Set timeout unit to nanoseconds
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:02:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161212170259.GJ25175@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481559490-13844-5-git-send-email-ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:18:07PM +0000, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> The hypervisor already expects the timeout from the hypercall to be in
> nanoseconds, so set this expectation everywhere.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
> ---
>  tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h | 2 +-
>  xen/common/livepatch.c        | 4 ++--
>  xen/include/public/sysctl.h   | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
> index 2c83544..4ab0f57 100644
> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
> @@ -2703,7 +2703,7 @@ int xc_livepatch_list(xc_interface *xch, unsigned int max, unsigned int start,
>   * The operations are asynchronous and the hypervisor may take a while
>   * to complete them. The `timeout` offers an option to expire the
>   * operation if it could not be completed within the specified time
> - * (in ms). Value of 0 means let hypervisor decide the best timeout.
> + * (in ns). Value of 0 means let hypervisor decide the best timeout.

Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

>   */
>  int xc_livepatch_apply(xc_interface *xch, char *name, uint32_t timeout);
>  int xc_livepatch_revert(xc_interface *xch, char *name, uint32_t timeout);
> diff --git a/xen/common/livepatch.c b/xen/common/livepatch.c
> index fc8ef99..246e673 100644
> --- a/xen/common/livepatch.c
> +++ b/xen/common/livepatch.c
> @@ -1227,8 +1227,8 @@ static int schedule_work(struct payload *data, uint32_t cmd, uint32_t timeout)
>      livepatch_work.data = data;
>      livepatch_work.timeout = timeout ?: MILLISECS(30);
>  
> -    dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, LIVEPATCH "%s: timeout is %"PRI_stime"ms\n",
> -            data->name, livepatch_work.timeout / MILLISECS(1));
> +    dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, LIVEPATCH "%s: timeout is %"PRIu32"ns\n",
> +            data->name, livepatch_work.timeout);
>  
>      atomic_set(&livepatch_work.semaphore, -1);
>  
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
> index 28ac56c..3c67858 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h
> @@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ struct xen_sysctl_livepatch_action {
>  #define LIVEPATCH_ACTION_REPLACE      4
>      uint32_t cmd;                           /* IN: LIVEPATCH_ACTION_*. */
>      uint32_t timeout;                       /* IN: Zero if no timeout. */
> -                                            /* Or upper bound of time (ms) */
> +                                            /* Or upper bound of time (ns) */

Is this only fixing a typo or does it constitute a change in behaviour?
The latter would result in bumping the sysctl number. But from the look
of the patch I think it is doing the former.

>                                              /* for operation to take. */
>  };
>  typedef struct xen_sysctl_livepatch_action xen_sysctl_livepatch_action_t;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-12 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-12 16:18 [PATCH v1 0/7] xen-livepatch misc fixes/changes Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] tools/livepatch: Show the correct expected state before action Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:02   ` Wei Liu
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] tools/livepatch: Set stdout and stderr unbuffered Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:02   ` Wei Liu
2016-12-14  6:44     ` Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-14  7:43       ` Wei Liu
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] tools/livepatch: Improve output Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:02   ` Wei Liu
2016-12-12 17:11     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] livepatch: Set timeout unit to nanoseconds Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:02   ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-12-12 17:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] tools/livepatch: Remove pointless retry loop Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:03   ` Wei Liu
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] tools/livepatch: Remove unused struct member Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:03   ` Wei Liu
2016-12-12 17:13   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] tools/livepatch: Exit with 2 if a timeout occurs Ross Lagerwall
2016-12-12 17:02   ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161212170259.GJ25175@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).