From: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, he.chen@linux.intel.com,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, mengxu@cis.upenn.edu,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: assemble features value array.
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:17:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112011753.GN7435@yi.y.sun> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <587647DA020000780012F0A9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 17-01-11 06:57:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.01.17 at 07:07, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 17-01-10 07:34:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 14.12.16 at 05:07, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > +static int l3_cat_set_new_val(uint64_t val[],
> >> > + const struct feat_node *feat,
> >> > + unsigned int old_cos,
> >> > + enum cbm_type type,
> >> > + uint64_t m)
> >> > +{
> >> > + if ( type != PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3 )
> >> > + /* L3 CAT uses one COS. Skip it. */
> >> > + return 1;
> >>
> >> If this is the wrong type, how can you return 1 (or any positive
> >> value) here? This basically suggests that, as recommended for an
> >> earlier operation already, that you want the type check done in
> >> the caller. Or wait - isn't type not matching an error here, as you
> >> iterate the same list twice in the same order? Which then gets us
> >> back to me mentioning that the set-new-value should really be
> >> done in common code, not in the callbacks; it would really only be
> >> the check (psr_check_cbm() in the L3 case above) which would
> >> require a callback.
> >>
> > Your understanding is right. The value array will be iterated twice. First,
> > assemble all features old value into it. Second, set the target value into
> > array according to the target feature's position in the array. Because
> > different features may have different behaviors, e.g. CDP uses two entries
> > of the array, I think it would be better to make 'set_new_val' be a callback
> > function.
>
> Bot for common code to do that, all it takes is knowing the number
> of registers, which you already have a callback for.
>
Ok, will consider it. Thanks!
> Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-14 4:07 [PATCH v4 00/24] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 01/24] docs: create L2 Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) feature document Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 02/24] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes Yi Sun
2016-12-22 16:03 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-26 2:28 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 03/24] x86: refactor psr: implement main data structures Yi Sun
2016-12-22 16:13 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-26 6:56 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-03 8:00 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-03 8:49 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-03 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-03 10:28 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-03 11:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 04/24] x86: refactor psr: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-01-10 11:45 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 3:14 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-11 13:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-12 1:07 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 05/24] x86: refactor psr: implement Domain init/free and schedule flows Yi Sun
2017-01-10 13:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 3:17 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 06/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-01-10 13:46 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 5:13 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-11 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-12 1:08 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 07/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-01-10 13:50 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 5:16 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-11 13:54 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-12 1:09 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 08/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: implement framework Yi Sun
2017-01-10 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 5:57 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 09/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: assemble features value array Yi Sun
2017-01-10 14:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 6:07 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-11 13:57 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-12 1:17 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 10/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: implement cos finding flow Yi Sun
2017-01-10 14:53 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 6:10 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 11/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: implement cos id allocation flow Yi Sun
2017-01-10 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 6:16 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 12/24] x86: refactor psr: set value: implement write msr flow Yi Sun
2017-01-10 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-11 6:22 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-11 14:01 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-12 1:22 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-12 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-12 10:22 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 13/24] x86: refactor psr: implement CPU init and free flow for CDP Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 14/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get hw info " Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 15/24] x86: refactor psr: implement get value " Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 16/24] x86: refactor psr: implement set value callback functions " Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 17/24] x86: L2 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 18/24] x86: L2 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:07 ` [PATCH v4 19/24] x86: L2 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:08 ` [PATCH v4 20/24] x86: L2 CAT: implement set " Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:08 ` [PATCH v4 21/24] tools: L2 CAT: support get HW info for L2 CAT Yi Sun
2017-01-06 12:04 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-09 1:19 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-09 8:31 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-09 9:26 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-10 8:00 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-10 8:46 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-10 9:01 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:08 ` [PATCH v4 22/24] tools: L2 CAT: support show cbm " Yi Sun
2017-01-06 12:04 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-09 1:24 ` Yi Sun
2017-01-09 10:08 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-10 7:47 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:08 ` [PATCH v4 23/24] tools: L2 CAT: support set " Yi Sun
2017-01-06 12:04 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-09 1:14 ` Yi Sun
2016-12-14 4:08 ` [PATCH v4 24/24] docs: add L2 CAT description in docs Yi Sun
2017-01-06 12:04 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-09 1:25 ` Yi Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112011753.GN7435@yi.y.sun \
--to=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).