From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: fix affected memory range by dcache clean functions
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:08:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303060845.GI23726@toto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488503726-32320-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:15:26PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> clean_dcache_va_range and clean_and_invalidate_dcache_va_range don't
> calculate the range correctly when "end" is not cacheline aligned. As a
> result, the last cacheline is not skipped. Fix the issue by aligning the
> start address to the cacheline size.
>
> In addition, make the code simpler and faster in
> invalidate_dcache_va_range, by removing the module operation and using
> bitmasks instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
> CC: edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
This looks good to me and it works on my side.
In the future, perhaps we could convert invalidate_dcache_va_range
to use a smaller implementation like clean_dcache_va_range().
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
And super thanks for helping me resolve this issue!
Cheers,
Edgar
> ---
> xen/include/asm-arm/page.h | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h
> index 86de0b6..4b46e88 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h
> @@ -291,24 +291,20 @@ extern size_t cacheline_bytes;
>
> static inline int invalidate_dcache_va_range(const void *p, unsigned long size)
> {
> - size_t off;
> const void *end = p + size;
> + size_t cacheline_mask = cacheline_bytes - 1;
>
> dsb(sy); /* So the CPU issues all writes to the range */
>
> - off = (unsigned long)p % cacheline_bytes;
> - if ( off )
> + if ( (uintptr_t)p & cacheline_mask )
> {
> - p -= off;
> + p = (void *)((uintptr_t)p & ~cacheline_mask);
> asm volatile (__clean_and_invalidate_dcache_one(0) : : "r" (p));
> p += cacheline_bytes;
> - size -= cacheline_bytes - off;
> }
> - off = (unsigned long)end % cacheline_bytes;
> - if ( off )
> + if ( (uintptr_t)end & cacheline_mask )
> {
> - end -= off;
> - size -= off;
> + end = (void *)((uintptr_t)end & ~cacheline_mask);
> asm volatile (__clean_and_invalidate_dcache_one(0) : : "r" (end));
> }
>
> @@ -322,9 +318,10 @@ static inline int invalidate_dcache_va_range(const void *p, unsigned long size)
>
> static inline int clean_dcache_va_range(const void *p, unsigned long size)
> {
> - const void *end;
> + const void *end = p + size;
> dsb(sy); /* So the CPU issues all writes to the range */
> - for ( end = p + size; p < end; p += cacheline_bytes )
> + p = (void *)((uintptr_t)p & ~(cacheline_bytes - 1));
> + for ( ; p < end; p += cacheline_bytes )
> asm volatile (__clean_dcache_one(0) : : "r" (p));
> dsb(sy); /* So we know the flushes happen before continuing */
> /* ARM callers assume that dcache_* functions cannot fail. */
> @@ -334,9 +331,10 @@ static inline int clean_dcache_va_range(const void *p, unsigned long size)
> static inline int clean_and_invalidate_dcache_va_range
> (const void *p, unsigned long size)
> {
> - const void *end;
> + const void *end = p + size;
> dsb(sy); /* So the CPU issues all writes to the range */
> - for ( end = p + size; p < end; p += cacheline_bytes )
> + p = (void *)((uintptr_t)p & ~(cacheline_bytes - 1));
> + for ( ; p < end; p += cacheline_bytes )
> asm volatile (__clean_and_invalidate_dcache_one(0) : : "r" (p));
> dsb(sy); /* So we know the flushes happen before continuing */
> /* ARM callers assume that dcache_* functions cannot fail. */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 1:15 [PATCH] xen/arm: fix affected memory range by dcache clean functions Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-03 6:08 ` Edgar E. Iglesias [this message]
2017-03-04 17:45 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170303060845.GI23726@toto \
--to=edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).