From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Refactor x86 domain builder
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 09:41:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303094111.12217-1-wei.liu2@citrix.com> (raw)
Long term we want to separate different sets of guest supporting code. We would
like to have CONFIG_HVM and CONFIG_PV (maybe even CONFIG_PVH?). I will start
to dientangle Xen code component by component. This is also somewhat related to
the project to move PV interface inside a PVH container, which I plan to work
on soon.
RFC because I would like to know whether I should start putting them into pv
and hvm directory respectively. And I would also like to know the reception of
the idea to disentangle Xen guest supporting code in general.
This series is built on top of Roger's PVHv1 removal series.
Wei Liu (5):
xen: move round_pg{up,down} to pfn.h
xen: include xen/types.h in domain.h
x86: split PV dom0 builder to domain_build_pv.c
x86: split PVH dom0 builder to domain_build_pv.c
x86: clean up header files in domain_build.c
xen/arch/x86/Makefile | 2 +
xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c | 2003 +--------------------------------------
xen/arch/x86/domain_build.h | 40 +
xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pv.c | 909 ++++++++++++++++++
xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pvh.c | 1097 +++++++++++++++++++++
xen/common/page_alloc.c | 4 +-
xen/include/xen/domain.h | 2 +
xen/include/xen/pfn.h | 3 +
8 files changed, 2070 insertions(+), 1990 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/x86/domain_build.h
create mode 100644 xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pv.c
create mode 100644 xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pvh.c
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 9:41 Wei Liu [this message]
2017-03-03 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] xen: move round_pg{up,down} to pfn.h Wei Liu
2017-03-03 10:05 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] xen: move round_pg{up, down} " Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:15 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] xen: include xen/types.h in domain.h Wei Liu
2017-03-03 10:05 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] x86: split PV dom0 builder to domain_build_pv.c Wei Liu
2017-03-03 11:06 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-03 11:15 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 13:35 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 14:33 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 14:45 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 14:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-03 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 17:08 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 16:16 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] x86: split PVH " Wei Liu
2017-03-03 11:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-03 13:39 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 15:38 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-03 16:18 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] x86: clean up header files in domain_build.c Wei Liu
2017-03-03 16:18 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:02 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] Refactor x86 domain builder Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-03 11:06 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 13:41 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 14:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 14:45 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 11:06 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170303094111.12217-1-wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).