xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] x86: split PVH dom0 builder to domain_build_pv.c
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:39:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303133924.g4jw3zaezifmhe25@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170303111639.ax5kq6oarb2fl2ih@dhcp-3-221.uk.xensource.com>

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 11:16:39AM +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:41:10AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Long term we want to be able to disentangle PV and HVM code. Move the
> > PVH domain builder to a dedicated file. It will later depends on
> > CONFIG_HVM or CONFIG_PVH.
> > 
> > This in turn requires exposing a few functions and variables via
> > domain_build.h.
> 
> Again I would add something along the lines: "No functional changes expected".
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/x86/Makefile           |    1 +
> >  xen/arch/x86/domain_build.c     | 1068 +------------------------------------
> >  xen/arch/x86/domain_build.h     |    8 +
> >  xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pvh.c | 1097 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> I would prefer that to be in arch/x86/hvm/.
> 
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pvh.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pvh.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..6cd3ff2ef2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_build_pvh.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1097 @@
> > +/******************************************************************************
> > + * domain_build_pvh.c
> > + */
> 
> Since you are already touching this, and it's mostly my code, I would rather
> prefer that you add the following header:
> 
> /******************************************************************************
>  * arch/x86/hvm/domain_build.c
>  *
>  * PVH domain builder
>  *
>  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>  * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>  * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>  * (at your option) any later version.

I suggest we use the inbound licence listed in CONTRIBUTING. I think it
is GPL v2 only, without the any later version part.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-03 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-03  9:41 [PATCH RFC 0/5] Refactor x86 domain builder Wei Liu
2017-03-03  9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] xen: move round_pg{up,down} to pfn.h Wei Liu
2017-03-03 10:05   ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] xen: move round_pg{up, down} " Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:15     ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03  9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] xen: include xen/types.h in domain.h Wei Liu
2017-03-03 10:05   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03  9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] x86: split PV dom0 builder to domain_build_pv.c Wei Liu
2017-03-03 11:06   ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-03 11:15     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 13:35       ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 14:33         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 14:45           ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 14:49             ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-03 15:15               ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 17:08               ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 16:16   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03  9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] x86: split PVH " Wei Liu
2017-03-03 11:16   ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-03 13:39     ` Wei Liu [this message]
2017-03-03 15:38       ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-03 16:18   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03  9:41 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] x86: clean up header files in domain_build.c Wei Liu
2017-03-03 16:18   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:02 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] Refactor x86 domain builder Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 10:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-03 11:06   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 13:41     ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 14:34       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-03 14:45         ` Wei Liu
2017-03-03 11:06   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170303133924.g4jw3zaezifmhe25@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).