From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/6] passthrough/io: don't migrate pirq when it is delivered through VT-d PI
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:38:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170320023850.GB61424@skl-2s3.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58CFAC6A0200007800144DA1@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:18:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 20.03.17 at 02:59, <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 04:43:08AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 15.03.17 at 06:11, <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> + if ( iommu_intpost )
>>>> + {
>>>> + vcpu = pi_find_dest_vcpu(d, dest, dest_mode, delivery_mode,
>>>> + pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec);
>>>
>>>This is now outside of the event_lock-ed region - is this safe?
>>
>> do you mean it is __inside__ the event_lock-ed region?
>
>Oops, indeed.
>
>> I think it is safe
>> for the functions called by pi_find_dest_vcpu() are almost same with
>> hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id.
>
>The question then needs to be put differently: Is this needed?
>You shouldn't move into a locked region what doesn't need to
>be there.
Yes. For we rely on the result to set @via_pi which needs to be
protected by the lock.
>
>>>> + }
>>>> spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
>>>> if ( dest_vcpu_id >= 0 )
>>>> hvm_migrate_pirqs(d->vcpu[dest_vcpu_id]);
>>>
>>>(continuing from above) This could then use vcpu too.
>>
>> I don't understand. In this patch, vcpu is always null when VT-d PI is not
>> enabled. Do you mean something like below:
>>
>> if ( dest_vcpu_id >= 0 )
>> vcpu = d->vcpu[dest_vcpu_id];
>> if ( iommu_intpost && (!vcpu) && (delivery_mode == dest_LowestPrio) )
>> {
>> vcpu = vector_hashing_dest(d, dest, dest_mode,pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec);
>> ...
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
>> if ( vcpu )
>> hvm_migrate_pirqs(vcpu);
>
>Yes, along these lines, albeit I think the first if() is more complicated
>than it needs to be.
We can make it simple like this:
const struct *vcpu vcpu;
...
vcpu = (dest_vcpu_id >= 0) ? d->vcpu[dest_vcpu_id] : NULL;
Thanks
Chao
>
>Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-20 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 5:11 [PATCH v10 0/6] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Chao Gao
2017-03-15 5:11 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] VT-d: Introduce new fields in msi_desc to track binding with guest interrupt Chao Gao
2017-03-15 16:41 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-15 21:21 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-16 10:24 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-22 5:59 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-22 0:18 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-22 8:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-15 5:11 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] VT-d: Some cleanups Chao Gao
2017-03-15 5:11 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] VMX: Fixup PI descriptor when cpu is offline Chao Gao
2017-03-15 5:11 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] VT-d: introduce update_irte to update irte safely Chao Gao
2017-03-15 16:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-15 22:39 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-16 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-17 1:52 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-17 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-22 6:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-24 8:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-15 5:11 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] passthrough/io: don't migrate pirq when it is delivered through VT-d PI Chao Gao
2017-03-17 10:43 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-20 1:59 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-20 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-20 2:38 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2017-03-20 10:26 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-20 5:22 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-20 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-20 6:11 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-15 5:11 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] passthrough/io: Fall back to remapping interrupt when we can't use " Chao Gao
2017-03-17 10:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-22 6:34 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170320023850.GB61424@skl-2s3.sh.intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).