From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] passthrough: don't migrate pirq when it is delivered through VT-d PI
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:42:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331024211.GA86540@skl-2s3.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58DE3E23020000780014B19C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 03:31:47AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 29.03.17 at 07:11, <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>> @@ -442,17 +397,24 @@ int pt_irq_create_bind(
>> dest_vcpu_id = hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id(d, dest, dest_mode);
>> pirq_dpci->gmsi.dest_vcpu_id = dest_vcpu_id;
>> spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
>> +
>> + pirq_dpci->gmsi.posted = false;
>> + vcpu = (dest_vcpu_id >= 0) ? d->vcpu[dest_vcpu_id] : NULL;
>> + if ( iommu_intpost && (delivery_mode == dest_LowestPrio) )
>
>Why again would dest_Fixed not allow posted delivery? This needs
No this restriction. For dest_Fixed case, hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id() gives
the same output with pi_find_dest_vcpu(). Thus we don't call it again, just
use the return value of hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id().
>recording in a comment, if there really is such a restriction. Or did
>you really mean to place ...
>
>> + {
>> + vcpu = vector_hashing_dest(d, dest, dest_mode,
>> + pirq_dpci->gmsi.gvec);
>> + if ( vcpu )
>> + pirq_dpci->gmsi.posted = true;
>
>... this ...
>
>> + }
>
>... after this brace (which then wouldn't be needed anymore)? If
>so, is there any point calling vector_hashing_dest() when vcpu is
>already non-NULL prior to the if()?
>
>This then also raises the question whether the call to
>hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id() is actually legitimate for lowest
>priority delivery mode.
For lowest priority delivery mode, if VT-d PI is enabled, the result (the
destination vcpu) is overrided by vector_hashing_dest() to keep the
existing behavior. I think the only point we should keep in mind is
for cases other than lowest priority delivery mode, pi_find_dest_vcpu()
and hvm_girq_dest_2_vcpu_id() give the same destination vcpu.
Thanks
Chao
>
>Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 5:11 [PATCH v11 0/6] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Chao Gao
2017-03-29 5:11 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] passthrough: don't migrate pirq when it is delivered through VT-d PI Chao Gao
2017-03-31 5:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-30 23:10 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-31 10:27 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 9:31 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 2:42 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2017-03-31 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 3:27 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-31 10:38 ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 0:20 ` Chao Gao
2017-04-05 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 5:11 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] VT-d: Introduce new fields in msi_desc to track binding with guest interrupt Chao Gao
2017-03-31 5:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-30 23:01 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-31 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 1:13 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-31 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 5:11 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] VT-d: Some cleanups Chao Gao
2017-03-29 5:11 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] VMX: Fixup PI descriptor when cpu is offline Chao Gao
2017-03-29 5:11 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] VT-d: introduce update_irte to update irte safely Chao Gao
2017-03-31 6:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-31 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-04 19:12 ` Chao Gao
2017-04-05 7:40 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 5:11 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] passthrough/io: Fall back to remapping interrupt when we can't use VT-d PI Chao Gao
2017-03-31 5:13 ` [PATCH v11 0/6] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331024211.GA86540@skl-2s3.sh.intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).