From: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
he.chen@linux.intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
dario.faggioli@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:40:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331124044.GC17458@yi.y.sun> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58DE4965020000780014B248@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 17-03-31 04:19:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.03.17 at 11:12, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 17-03-31 02:47:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 30.03.17 at 14:10, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On 17-03-30 05:55:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 30.03.17 at 03:37, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On 17-03-29 03:57:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> On 29.03.17 at 03:36, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > On 17-03-29 09:20:21, Yi Sun wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On 17-03-28 06:20:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > >>> On 28.03.17 at 13:59, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > > I think we at least need a 'get_val()' hook.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Of course.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > > I try to implement CAT/CDP hook.
> >> >> >> >> > > Please help to check if this is what you thought.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > One remark below, but other than that - yes.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > > static void cat_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
> >> >> >> >> > > enum cbm_type type, int flag, uint32_t *val)
> >> >> >> >> > > {
> >> >> >> >> > > *val = feat->cos_reg_val[cos];
> >> >> >> >> > > }
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > > static void l3_cdp_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int
> >> >> > cos,
> >> >> >> >> > > enum cbm_type type, int flag, uint32_t *val)
> >> >> >> >> > > {
> >> >> >> >> > > if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA || flag == 0 )
> >> >> >> >> > > *val = get_cdp_data(feat, cos);
> >> >> >> >> > > if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE || flag == 1 )
> >> >> >> >> > > *val = get_cdp_code(feat, cos);
> >> >> >> >> > > }
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Why the redundancy between type and flag?
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> For psr_get_val, upper layer input the cbm_type to get either DATA or
> > CODE
> >> >> >> >> value. For other cases, we use flag as cos_num index to get either DATA
> > or
> >> >> >> >> CODE.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Let me explain more to avoid confusion. For other cases, we use cos_num
> > as
> >> >> >> > index to get values from a feature. In these cases, we do not know the
> >> >> >> > cbm_type of the feature. So, I use the cos_num as flag to make 'get_val'
> >> >> >> > know which value should be returned.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'm pretty sure this redundancy can be avoided.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > Then, I think I have to reuse the 'type'. As only CDP needs type to decide
> >> >> > which value to be returned so far, I think I can implement codes like
> > below
> >> >> > to make CDP can handle all scenarios.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > static void l3_cdp_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
> >> >> > enum cbm_type type, uint32_t *val)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> > if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA || flag == 0xF000 )
> >> >> > *val = get_cdp_data(feat, cos);
> >> >> > if ( type == PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE || flag == 0xF001 )
> >> >> > *val = get_cdp_code(feat, cos);
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > static bool fits_cos_max(...)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> > ......
> >> >> > for (i = 0; i < feat->props->cos_num; i++)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> > feat->props->get_val(feat, cos, i + 0xF000, &default_val);
> >> >> > if ( val[i] == default_val )
> >> >> > ......
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > ......
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Is that good for you?
> >> >>
> >> >> Urgh - no, not really: This is hackery. Do you have a tree
> >> >> somewhere so I could look at the file after at least the CDP
> >> >> patches have all been applied, to see whether I have a
> >> >> better idea? Alternatively, could you attach psr.c the way
> >> >> you have it right now with the entire series applied?
> >> >>
> >> > I think you can check v9 codes here:
> >> > https://github.com/yisun-git/xen/tree/l2_cat_v9
> >>
> >> Looking at this made me notice that cat_get_old_val() passes a
> >> bogus literal 0 to cat_get_val(), which needs taking care of too.
> >> One option I can see is for each feature to make available an
> >> array of type enum cbm_type, with cos_num elements. The order
> >> would match that of the order of values in their arrays. This will
> >
> > Sorry, not very clear your meaning. How to do that? Could you please
> > provide pieces of codes? Thanks!
>
> I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I don't see how I would reasonably supply
> code here without taking over your series altogether (which I don't
> intend to do). What is unclear with, at the example of CDP, you
> needing to add an array at initialization time, slot 0 of which holds
> PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA and slot 1 PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE (or
> the other way around). Granted I was wrong with the type of the
> array (as the above aren't enum psr_feat_type enumerators, but
> enum cbm_type ones), but I think the basic idea should have been
> clear anyway: You need to provide a way for generic code to pass
> suitable type information into ->get_val().
>
May I change the 'get_val()' parameter 'enum cbm_type' to a generic type
'unsigned int' to make it be a flexible type, and then combine feature
type with cos_num together as a flag to indicate which feature it is,
which value to get and distinguish it with cbm_type? For example:
#define CDP_GATHER_BOTH_DATA ( PSR_SOCKET_L3_CDP << 16 )
#define CDP_GATHER_BOTH_CODE ( PSR_SOCKET_L3_CDP << 16 + 1 )
static void l3_cdp_get_val(const struct feat_node *feat, unsigned int cos,
unsigned int type, uint32_t *val)
{
switch ( type )
{
case PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_DATA:
case CDP_GATHER_BOTH_DATA:
*val = get_cdp_data(feat, cos);
break;
case PSR_CBM_TYPE_L3_CODE:
case CDP_GATHER_BOTH_CODE:
*val = get_cdp_code(feat, cos);
break;
}
}
/* Example for getting value by cos_num. */
static bool fits_cos_max(...)
{
enum psr_feat_type feat_type;
...
for ( j = 0; j < feat->props->cos_num; j++ )
{
unsigned int type = feat_type << 16 + j;
feat->props->get_val(feat, 0, type, &default_val);
...
}
/* Example for getting value by cbm_type. */
int psr_get_val(enum cbm_type type...)
{
...
feat->props->get_val(feat, cos, type, val);
...
}
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 11:07 [PATCH v9 00/25] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 01/25] docs: create Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) and Code and Data Prioritization (CDP) feature document Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 02/25] x86: refactor psr: remove L3 CAT/CDP codes Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 03/25] x86: refactor psr: implement main data structures Yi Sun
2017-03-24 16:19 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 2:38 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 6:20 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 7:12 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 7:37 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 04/25] x86: move cpuid_count_leaf from cpuid.c to processor.h Yi Sun
2017-03-24 16:22 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 05/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-03-24 16:52 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 4:41 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 6:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 8:16 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 8:43 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 06/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement Domain init/free and schedule flows Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 07/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 12:24 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 13:19 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 08/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-27 12:59 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-27 13:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 2:13 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:10 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:07 ` [PATCH v9 09/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement framework Yi Sun
2017-03-27 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 1:21 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 10/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: assemble features value array Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:17 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 3:12 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:05 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:36 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 9:11 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:18 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:12 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 10:36 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 11/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos finding flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:28 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 3:26 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:41 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 12/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement cos id picking flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:37 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 4:58 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:45 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:31 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 10:40 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 11:59 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 12:20 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 1:20 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-29 1:36 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-29 9:57 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-30 1:37 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-30 1:39 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-30 11:55 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-30 12:10 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 9:12 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 9:18 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 10:19 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 12:40 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2017-03-31 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 13:22 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-31 14:35 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 14:46 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 13/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement write msr flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 5:06 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-28 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:20 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 14/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 15/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:08 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 5:13 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 16/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 17/25] x86: refactor psr: CDP: implement set value callback functions Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 5:14 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 18/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement CPU init and free flow Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 19/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement get hw info flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:38 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 5:16 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 20/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement get value flow Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 21/25] x86: L2 CAT: implement set " Yi Sun
2017-03-27 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 22/25] tools: L2 CAT: support get HW info for L2 CAT Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 23/25] tools: L2 CAT: support show cbm " Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 24/25] tools: L2 CAT: support set " Yi Sun
2017-03-28 14:04 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-29 1:21 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v9 25/25] docs: add L2 CAT description in docs Yi Sun
2017-03-16 11:20 ` [PATCH v9 00/25] Enable L2 Cache Allocation Technology & Refactor psr.c Jan Beulich
2017-03-17 1:29 ` Yi Sun
2017-03-17 7:25 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331124044.GC17458@yi.y.sun \
--to=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).