xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	cardoe@cardoe.com, pgnet.dev@gmail.com, ning.sun@intel.com,
	julien.grall@arm.com, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, qiaowei.ren@intel.com,
	gang.wei@intel.com, fu.wei@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 7/9] x86: make Xen early boot code relocatable
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:44:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170414014417.GG30837@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413141125.GN16658@olila.local.net-space.pl>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:11:25PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:23:33AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 21.02.17 at 20:19, <daniel.kiper@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
> > > specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
> > > compatible loader have to load image at specified address. However, there
> > > is no guarantee that the requested memory region (in case of Xen it starts
> > > at 2 MiB and ends at ~5 MiB) where image should be loaded initially is a RAM
> > > and it is free (legacy BIOS platforms are merciful for Xen but I found at
> > > least one EFI platform on which Xen load address conflicts with EFI boot
> > > services; it is Dell PowerEdge R820 with latest firmware). To cope with that
> > > problem we must make Xen early boot code relocatable and help boot loader to
> > > relocate image in proper way by suggesting, not requesting specific load
> > > addresses as it is right now, allowed address ranges. This patch does
> > > former.
> > > It does not add multiboot2 protocol interface which is done in "x86: add
> > > multiboot2 protocol support for relocatable images" patch.
> > >
> > > This patch changes following things:
> > >   - %esi register is used as a storage for Xen image load base address;
> > >     it is mostly unused in early boot code and preserved during C functions
> > >     calls in 32-bit mode,
> > >   - %fs is used as base for Xen data relative addressing in 32-bit code
> > >     if it is possible; %esi is used for that thing during error printing
> > >     because it is not always possible to properly and efficiently
> > >     initialize %fs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> It looks that everything passed through test gate and landed in master.
> So, this way we have full multiboot2 support in Xen. This means that
> you can boot Xen using GRUB2 on EFI platforms.
> 
> I would like to thank everybody who helped me to make it happen.
> Especially Jan who patiently reviewed whole series many times
> and replied for my stupid questions.
> 

<Konrad unscrews the vodka bottle!>

Yeeeeey! Congrats!

> Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-14  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 19:19 [PATCH v16 0/9] x86: multiboot2 protocol support Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 1/9] x86: add " Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 2/9] efi: build xen.gz with EFI code Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 3/9] efi: create new early memory allocator Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 4/9] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support for EFI platforms Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:24   ` Daniel Kiper
2017-02-22 13:42     ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-22 13:46       ` Doug Goldstein
2017-02-22 15:34       ` Daniel Kiper
2017-02-22 17:04         ` Doug Goldstein
2017-03-06 23:39           ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-08  3:44             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-08 14:17               ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-08 16:46                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-09 20:02               ` Doug Goldstein
2017-03-09 22:20                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-15 11:35                 ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-15 14:27                   ` Doug Goldstein
2017-03-15 14:38                     ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-15 14:42                       ` Doug Goldstein
2017-03-15 15:02                         ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-16 12:12                     ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-16 13:12                       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-16 13:35                         ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-16 13:43                           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-21 13:05                             ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-21 13:48                               ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-09 15:24             ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-09 15:41               ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-09 15:45               ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 5/9] x86: change default load address from 1 MiB to 2 MiB Daniel Kiper
2017-03-01  9:05   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 10:13     ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-01 10:34       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 10:51         ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-01 11:21           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-06 14:51             ` Daniel Kiper
2017-03-06 14:59               ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 6/9] x86/setup: use XEN_IMG_OFFSET instead of Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 7/9] x86: make Xen early boot code relocatable Daniel Kiper
2017-04-07 11:23   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-13 14:11     ` Daniel Kiper
2017-04-13 19:43       ` Doug Goldstein
2017-04-14 10:46         ` Daniel Kiper
2017-04-14  1:44       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2017-04-14 10:50         ` Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 8/9] x86/boot: rename sym_phys() to sym_offs() Daniel Kiper
2017-02-21 19:19 ` [PATCH v16 9/9] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support for relocatable images Daniel Kiper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170414014417.GG30837@char.us.oracle.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
    --cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=pgnet.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).