From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
julien.grall@arm.com, jbeulich@suse.com, chao.gao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/23] VIOMMU: Add irq request callback to deal with irq remapping
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:36:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418133651.GE25159@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a4d5005-024e-bb86-0efb-4c3f18e021ee@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:18:52PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 2017年04月17日 22:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 07:27:03PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >> This patch is to add irq request callback for platform implementation
> >> to deal with irq remapping request.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> xen/common/viommu.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >> xen/include/asm-arm/viommu.h | 4 ++++
> >> xen/include/asm-x86/viommu.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >> xen/include/xen/viommu.h | 8 ++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xen/common/viommu.c b/xen/common/viommu.c
> >> index 4c1c788..62c66db 100644
> >> --- a/xen/common/viommu.c
> >> +++ b/xen/common/viommu.c
> >> @@ -87,6 +87,17 @@ u64 viommu_query_caps(struct domain *d)
> >> return info->ops->query_caps(d);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +int viommu_handle_irq_request(struct domain *d,
> >> + struct irq_remapping_request *request)
> >> +{
> >> + struct viommu_info *info = &d->viommu;
> >> +
> >> + if ( !info || !info->ops || !info->ops->handle_irq_request)
> >
> > You are missing an space at the end.
>
> Yes, will fix.
>
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + return info->ops->handle_irq_request(d, request);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Local variables:
> >> * mode: C
> >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/viommu.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/viommu.h
> >> index ef6a60b..6a81ecb 100644
> >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/viommu.h
> >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/viommu.h
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> >>
> >> #include <xen/viommu.h>
> >>
> >> +struct irq_remapping_request
> >> +{
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static inline const struct viommu_ops *viommu_get_ops(void)
> >> {
> >> return NULL;
> >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/viommu.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/viommu.h
> >> index efb435f..b6e01a5 100644
> >> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/viommu.h
> >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/viommu.h
> >> @@ -23,6 +23,21 @@
> >> #include <xen/viommu.h>
> >> #include <asm/types.h>
> >>
> >> +struct irq_remapping_request
> >> +{
> >> + u8 type;
> >> + u16 source_id;
> >> + union {
> >> + /* MSI */
> >> + struct {
> >> + u64 addr;
> >> + u32 data;
> >> + } msi;
> >> + /* Redirection Entry in IOAPIC */
> >> + u64 rte;
> >> + } msg;
> >> +};
> >
> > Will this work right? As in with the default padding and such?
>
> Sorry. Could you elaborate this?
If you run 'pahole' on the xen-syms and then look at this
structure - do the offsets match with what the hardware expects?
As in, I see this:
struct irq_remapping_request {
u8 type; /* 0 1 */
/* XXX 1 byte hole, try to pack */
u16 source_id; /* 2 2 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
union {
struct {
u64 addr; /* 8 8 */
u32 data; /* 16 4 */
} msi; /* 16 */
u64 rte; /* 8 */
} msg; /* 8 16 */
/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* sum members: 19, holes: 2, sum holes: 5 */
/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
};
Is this OK? Or should the offsets be closer together?
>
> >> +
> >> static inline const struct viommu_ops *viommu_get_ops(void)
> >> {
> >> return NULL;
> >> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/viommu.h b/xen/include/xen/viommu.h
> >> index a0abbdf..246b29d 100644
> >> --- a/xen/include/xen/viommu.h
> >> +++ b/xen/include/xen/viommu.h
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
> >>
> >> #define NR_VIOMMU_PER_DOMAIN 1
> >>
> >> +/* IRQ request type */
> >> +#define VIOMMU_REQUEST_IRQ_MSI 0
> >> +#define VIOMMU_REQUEST_IRQ_APIC 1
> >
> > What is this used for?
>
> This is to designate interrupt type of irq remapping request which
> contains in the structure irq_remapping_request. The vIOMMU device model
> uses it to parse request data.
Does it make sense to have it as part of this patch? Even thought
it is not used here?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-17 11:27 [RFC PATCH 00/23] xen/vIOMMU: Add vIOMMU support with irq remapping fucntion on Intel platform Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/23] VIOMMU: Add vIOMMU helper functions to create, destroy and query capabilities Lan Tianyu
2017-03-21 19:56 ` Julien Grall
2017-03-22 8:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2017-03-22 12:41 ` Lan, Tianyu
2017-03-22 8:45 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-22 11:40 ` Julien Grall
2017-03-22 13:32 ` Lan, Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/23] DMOP: Introduce new DMOP commands for vIOMMU support Lan Tianyu
2017-04-17 14:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-18 7:24 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-04-18 13:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/23] VIOMMU: Add irq request callback to deal with irq remapping Lan Tianyu
2017-04-17 14:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-18 8:18 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-04-18 13:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/23] VIOMMU: Add get irq info callback to convert irq remapping request Lan Tianyu
2017-04-17 14:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 5/23] Tools/libxc: Add viommu operations in libxc Lan Tianyu
2017-03-28 16:24 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-29 0:40 ` Chao Gao
2017-03-29 9:08 ` Paul Durrant
2017-03-30 19:57 ` Chao Gao
2017-04-14 15:38 ` Lan, Tianyu
2017-04-17 11:08 ` Wei Liu
2017-04-17 12:01 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-05-11 12:35 ` Wei Liu
2017-05-11 12:31 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-04-18 9:08 ` Paul Durrant
2017-04-18 9:59 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-04-18 14:15 ` Paul Durrant
2017-04-19 12:21 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 6/23] Tools/libacpi: Add DMA remapping reporting (DMAR) ACPI table structures Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 7/23] Tools/libacpi: Add new fields in acpi_config to build DMAR table Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 8/23] Tools/libacpi: Add a user configurable parameter to control vIOMMU attributes Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 9/23] Tools/libxl: Inform device model to create a guest with a vIOMMU device Lan Tianyu
2017-03-28 16:24 ` Wei Liu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 10/23] x86/hvm: Introduce a emulated VTD for HVM Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 11/23] X86/vvtd: Add MMIO handler for VVTD Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 12/23] X86/vvtd: Set Interrupt Remapping Table Pointer through GCMD Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 13/23] X86/vvtd: Process interrupt remapping request Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 14/23] X86/vvtd: decode interrupt attribute from IRTE Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 15/23] X86/vioapic: Hook interrupt delivery of vIOAPIC Lan Tianyu
2017-04-17 14:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-18 8:34 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-04-18 13:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 16/23] X86/vvtd: Enable Queued Invalidation through GCMD Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 17/23] X86/vvtd: Enable Interrupt Remapping " Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 18/23] x86/vpt: Get interrupt vector through a vioapic interface Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 19/23] passthrough: move some fields of hvm_gmsi_info to a sub-structure Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 20/23] Tools/libxc: Add a new interface to bind msi-ir with pirq Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 21/23] X86/vmsi: Hook guest MSI injection Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 22/23] X86/vvtd: Handle interrupt translation faults Lan Tianyu
2017-03-17 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 23/23] X86/vvtd: Add queued invalidation (QI) support Lan Tianyu
2017-03-20 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH 00/23] xen/vIOMMU: Add vIOMMU support with irq remapping fucntion on Intel platform Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-21 2:28 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-21 5:29 ` Lan Tianyu
2017-03-29 8:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-03-29 3:52 ` Chao Gao
2017-04-17 14:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-04-18 8:19 ` Lan Tianyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170418133651.GE25159@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).