From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?= Subject: Re: (pv)?grub and PVHv2 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:59:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20170605185940.GY1335@mail-itl> References: <20170602093350.GA1394@mail-itl> <20170602095854.tpfn53v42nondf4f@dhcp-3-128.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3077912584673542620==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: George Dunlap Cc: Anthony Perard , xen-devel , Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============3077912584673542620== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RJZzeD23Ed8sO2FB" Content-Disposition: inline --RJZzeD23Ed8sO2FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:55:24AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-G=C3=B3rec= ki wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any method to boot PVHv2 domain using a kernel fetched from > >> that domain's disk image, _without_ mounting it in dom0? Something like > >> pvgrub was for PV. > > > > Hello, > > > > Anthony (Cced) is working on an OVMF port, so it can be used as > > firmware for PVHv2 guests. >=20 > I think in theory it shouldn't be too hard to port the pvgrub2 code to > boot into PVH, since it already boots in PV, right? >=20 > Is this something we should try to encourage, or do you think it would > be better to route everyone through EFI? For Qubes OS I think EFI is good enough here. Any system supporting PVHv2 also support EFI (right?), so it shouldn't limit anything. --=20 Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? --RJZzeD23Ed8sO2FB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZNaocAAoJENuP0xzK19csheEH/iksfrXnrRxs8CVQXLpNvyE+ A40ofxQEVR/fbjq0tyx+Nfuk/1qtxu2kUIFB7RhrSeukLVZrzrHXymWrhcdetdUs o5STZ2w6Llj/Utvje8U2vvCPJ2j4oR7IGn5TBnqUTRbXIuDawmrdEQ3uXwDSj4Lc 7lGTMUvhWIuNKD38LZFvZGWp2lvw9kLenAmMTU9B/0m4GIVDWiu0exVcsUyUJJ6k ew7IfcZCHP4XABpFaAWO49X6k580IhBZUy8vhbD2W6YpLl8jHop2cvkmixkDIcyj NbYxXOjoMlbbnka9L6l1BaiX4+jh23E33jgOjxO2A+DDguqiYYSwfzAQdfAk4Ds= =afYY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RJZzeD23Ed8sO2FB-- --===============3077912584673542620== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============3077912584673542620==--