From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.9 v2] xen/livepatch: Don't crash on encountering STN_UNDEF relocations
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 21:26:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622012615.GA8146@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498068816-21894-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:13:36PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> A symndx of STN_UNDEF is special, and means a symbol value of 0. While
> legitimate in the ELF standard, its existance in a livepatch is questionable
> at best. Until a plausible usecase presents itself, reject such a relocation
> with -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Additionally, perform a safety check on elf->sym[symndx].sym before
> derefencing it, to avoid tripping over a NULL pointer when calculating val.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> [x86 right now, will do
arm32 tomorrow]
I naturally had to have "xen/livepatch: Clean up arch relocation handling"
on top of this.
> ---
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> CC: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>
> v2:
> * Reject STN_UNDEF with -EOPNOTSUPP
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/arm32/livepatch.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> xen/arch/arm/arm64/livepatch.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> xen/arch/x86/livepatch.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/livepatch.c b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/livepatch.c
> index a328179..53fee91 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm32/livepatch.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm32/livepatch.c
> @@ -254,14 +254,27 @@ int arch_livepatch_perform(struct livepatch_elf *elf,
> addend = get_addend(type, dest);
> }
>
> + if ( symndx == STN_UNDEF )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: Encountered STN_UNDEF\n",
> + elf->name);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> if ( symndx > elf->nsym )
> {
> dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: Relative symbol wants symbol@%u which is past end!\n",
> elf->name, symndx);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - val = elf->sym[symndx].sym->st_value; /* S */
> + else if ( !elf->sym[symndx].sym )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: No relative symbol@%u\n",
> + elf->name, symndx);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + else
> + val = elf->sym[symndx].sym->st_value; /* S */
>
> rc = perform_rel(type, dest, val, addend);
> switch ( rc )
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/livepatch.c b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/livepatch.c
> index 63929b1..b033763 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/livepatch.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/livepatch.c
> @@ -252,14 +252,27 @@ int arch_livepatch_perform_rela(struct livepatch_elf *elf,
> int ovf = 0;
> uint64_t val;
>
> + if ( symndx == STN_UNDEF )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: Encountered STN_UNDEF\n",
> + elf->name);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> if ( symndx > elf->nsym )
> {
> dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: Relative relocation wants symbol@%u which is past end!\n",
> elf->name, symndx);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - val = elf->sym[symndx].sym->st_value + r->r_addend; /* S+A */
> + else if ( !elf->sym[symndx].sym )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: No relative symbol@%u\n",
> + elf->name, symndx);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + else
> + val = elf->sym[symndx].sym->st_value + r->r_addend; /* S+A */
>
> /* ARM64 operations at minimum are always 32-bit. */
> if ( r->r_offset >= base->sec->sh_size ||
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/livepatch.c b/xen/arch/x86/livepatch.c
> index 7917610..bfa576c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/livepatch.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/livepatch.c
> @@ -170,14 +170,27 @@ int arch_livepatch_perform_rela(struct livepatch_elf *elf,
> uint8_t *dest = base->load_addr + r->r_offset;
> uint64_t val;
>
> + if ( symndx == STN_UNDEF )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: Encountered STN_UNDEF\n",
> + elf->name);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> if ( symndx > elf->nsym )
> {
> dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: Relative relocation wants symbol@%u which is past end!\n",
> elf->name, symndx);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - val = r->r_addend + elf->sym[symndx].sym->st_value;
> + else if ( !elf->sym[symndx].sym )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, LIVEPATCH "%s: No symbol@%u\n",
> + elf->name, symndx);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + else
> + val = r->r_addend + elf->sym[symndx].sym->st_value;
>
> switch ( ELF64_R_TYPE(r->r_info) )
> {
> --
> 2.1.4
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-13 20:51 [PATCH 1/2] xen/livepatch: Clean up arch relocation handling Andrew Cooper
2017-06-13 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen/livepatch: Don't crash on encountering STN_UNDEF relocations Andrew Cooper
2017-06-13 21:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-14 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-14 10:11 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-14 10:13 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-14 10:24 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-14 14:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-14 18:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-14 18:49 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-19 18:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-19 23:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-20 7:15 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-20 13:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-14 19:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-21 18:13 ` [PATCH for-4.9 v2] " Andrew Cooper
2017-06-22 1:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2017-06-22 15:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-22 16:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-22 16:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-22 17:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-23 9:44 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-22 7:40 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-22 9:49 ` Ross Lagerwall
2017-06-14 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen/livepatch: Clean up arch relocation handling Jan Beulich
2017-06-14 13:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-14 14:02 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-14 18:28 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-19 18:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-20 7:36 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-20 7:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-20 7:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-20 7:56 ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-20 13:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-22 1:27 ` Is [PATCH for-4.9] Was:Re: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170622012615.GA8146@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).