xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <liuw@liuw.name>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.9] livepatch: Declare live patching as a supported feature
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:07:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170626210709.GC8071@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba4f24fc-4304-fee3-3618-7f8da12121ac@arm.com>

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 06/26/2017 04:36 PM, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > Xen Live Patching has been available as tech preview feature since Xen
> > 4.7 and has now had a couple of releases to stabilize. Xen Live patching
> > has been used by multiple vendors to fix several real-world security
> > issues without any severe bugs encountered. Additionally, there are now
> > tests in OSSTest that test live patching to ensure that no regressions
> > are introduced.
> > 
> > Based on the amount of testing and usage it has had, we are ready to
> > declare live patching as a 'Supported' feature.
> 
> There are only test for x86 and amd64. We likely want to have those test

The test-cases are also for ARM32.

> enabled for all architectures by default.

And the OSSTest can test all of those.
> 
> Also, I am not aware of anyone using in production livepatch on ARM64 and
> ARM32. So did anyone give a good kick at the ARM implementation?

I am not aware of anybody using it on production on ARM32 or ARM64.

The test-cases are there, the code is there, but yes nobody has kicked
the tires on ARM32/ARM64 extensively with it. I would be excited to
see vendors that use it and their reports but I am not aware of any.

> 
> If not, then we should  do it before even considering as a supported feature
> for ARM.

OK. Perhaps then only for x86 until ARM operational users pipe up?

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-26 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-26 15:36 [PATCH for-4.9] livepatch: Declare live patching as a supported feature Ross Lagerwall
2017-06-26 16:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-26 16:50   ` George Dunlap
2017-06-26 16:53     ` Ian Jackson
2017-06-26 17:18     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-27  8:37       ` George Dunlap
2017-06-27 10:47         ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-27 10:49           ` George Dunlap
2017-06-26 16:50   ` Ross Lagerwall
2017-06-26 17:04     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-27  6:04   ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-27  7:19     ` Julien Grall
2017-06-27 11:23       ` Jan Beulich
2017-06-27 11:34     ` George Dunlap
2017-06-26 17:00 ` George Dunlap
2017-06-26 17:30   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-06-27  9:17     ` George Dunlap
2017-06-28 16:18       ` Ross Lagerwall
2017-06-28 16:41         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-06-30 13:42         ` George Dunlap
2017-07-03 14:53           ` Ross Lagerwall
2017-07-04  8:36             ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-08-03 17:20             ` George Dunlap
2017-08-03 17:21               ` George Dunlap
2017-08-06  0:07                 ` Is:livepatch-build-tools.git declare it supported? Was:Re: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-07 10:26                   ` George Dunlap
2017-08-07 15:59                     ` Jan Beulich
2017-08-08 11:16                       ` George Dunlap
2017-08-09  7:36                         ` Jan Beulich
2017-08-21 10:59                           ` George Dunlap
2017-08-21 12:07                             ` Jan Beulich
2017-08-21 15:28                               ` George Dunlap
2017-08-22  6:37                                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-08-22 10:58                                   ` George Dunlap
2017-08-22 11:16                                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-08-29 14:44                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-29 14:46                                   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-08-29 14:48                                   ` George Dunlap
2017-06-26 18:29 ` Julien Grall
2017-06-26 21:07   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2017-06-27  7:24     ` Julien Grall
2017-06-27  8:09       ` Lars Kurth
2017-06-27 10:49         ` Ian Jackson
2017-06-27 10:59           ` Lars Kurth
2017-06-27 10:46       ` Ian Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170626210709.GC8071@char.us.oracle.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
    --cc=liuw@liuw.name \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).