From: shuo.a.liu@intel.com
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: Why xen-pirq chip use startup_irq() for .irq_enable?
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:25:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728012515.GA14513@shuo-intel.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68e1206c-219b-85d8-15e8-cc591158207d@oracle.com>
On Thu 27.Jul'17 at 12:06:10 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>(Adjusting addressees: David is no longer maintaining Xen code, Juergen is)
Thanks Boris.
>
>On 07/27/2017 09:04 AM, shuo.a.liu@intel.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Here is a device has xen-pirq-MSI interrupt. I found dom0 might lost
>> interrupt during driver irq_disable/irq_enable.
>> There is a pair of irq_disable/enable in driver. Here is the scenario,
>> 1. irq_disable(dev_irq) -> disable_dynirq -> mask_evtchn(dev_irq
>> channel)
>> 2. dev interrupt raised by HW and Xen mark its evtchn as *pending*
>> status.
>> 3. irq_enable(dev_irq) -> startup_pirq -> eoi_pirq ->
>> clear_evtchn(channel of dev_irq) -> clear *pending* status
>> 4. consume_one_event process the dev irq event without pending bit
>> assert
>> which result in interrupt lost once.
>> 5. No HW interrupt raising anymore.
>>
>> The first question here is why using startup_irq for .irq_enable
>> rather than
>> enable_dynirq ? startup_irq will do eoi_pirq who clear the mask bit
>> and pending
>> bit of the channel while enable_dynirq just only unmask the channel.
>
>Seems like enable_dynirq() would indeed be the right choice. What is a
>bit strange is that scenario that you are describing looks pretty common
>so we should have hit this problem before.
This point confused me also. It seems the code has been here for long time.
Anyway, if you think it is the right fix, i can send out a formal patch.
>>
>> Second question is that what's the purpose of eoi_pirq in startup_irq?
>
>When we are actually creating new pirq we want to make sure there are no
>pending interrupts left over from previous use of the pirq.
If interrupt raise just before eoi_pirq in startup_irq, we might face
the same issue? Can we make sure pirq is clean when do binding?
Thx -
Shuo
>-boris
>
>>
>> BTW, i can resolve my problem by below patch. Does it make sence?
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> index 4bf7a34..341c456 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static void shutdown_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
>>
>> static void enable_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
>> {
>> - startup_pirq(data);
>> + enable_dynirq(data);
>> }
>>
>> static void disable_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 13:04 Why xen-pirq chip use startup_irq() for .irq_enable? shuo.a.liu
2017-07-27 16:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-28 1:25 ` shuo.a.liu [this message]
2017-07-28 21:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-29 15:32 ` shuo.a.liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728012515.GA14513@shuo-intel.sh.intel.com \
--to=shuo.a.liu@intel.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).