xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] x86/np2m: Have invept flush all np2m entries with the same base pointer
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:01:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170929150144.7602-2-george.dunlap@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929150144.7602-1-george.dunlap@citrix.com>

nvmx_handle_invept() updates current's np2m just to flush it.  This is
not only wasteful, but ineffective: if several L2 vcpus share the same
np2m base pointer, they all need to be flushed (not only the current
one).

Introduce a new function, np2m_flush_base() which will flush all
shadow p2m's that match a given base pointer.

Convert p2m_flush_table() into p2m_flush_table_locked() in order not
to release the p2m_lock after np2m_base check.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Combine patches 2 and 3 ("x86/np2m: add np2m_flush_base()" and
    "x86/vvmx: use np2m_flush_base() for INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT")
- Reword commit text

CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c |  7 +------
 xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c       | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h   |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
index cd0ee0a307..d333aa6d78 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
@@ -1910,12 +1910,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_invept(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     {
     case INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT:
     {
-        struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_nestedp2m(current, eptp);
-        if ( p2m )
-        {
-            p2m_flush(current, p2m);
-            ept_sync_domain(p2m);
-        }
+        np2m_flush_base(current, eptp);
         break;
     }
     case INVEPT_ALL_CONTEXT:
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
index 27b90eb815..b7588b2ec1 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
@@ -1711,15 +1711,14 @@ p2m_getlru_nestedp2m(struct domain *d, struct p2m_domain *p2m)
     return p2m;
 }
 
-/* Reset this p2m table to be empty */
 static void
-p2m_flush_table(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
+p2m_flush_table_locked(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
 {
     struct page_info *top, *pg;
     struct domain *d = p2m->domain;
     mfn_t mfn;
 
-    p2m_lock(p2m);
+    ASSERT(p2m_locked_by_me(p2m));
 
     /*
      * "Host" p2m tables can have shared entries &c that need a bit more care
@@ -1732,10 +1731,7 @@ p2m_flush_table(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
 
     /* No need to flush if it's already empty */
     if ( p2m_is_nestedp2m(p2m) && p2m->np2m_base == P2M_BASE_EADDR )
-    {
-        p2m_unlock(p2m);
         return;
-    }
 
     /* This is no longer a valid nested p2m for any address space */
     p2m->np2m_base = P2M_BASE_EADDR;
@@ -1755,7 +1751,14 @@ p2m_flush_table(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
             d->arch.paging.free_page(d, pg);
     }
     page_list_add(top, &p2m->pages);
+}
 
+/* Reset this p2m table to be empty */
+static void
+p2m_flush_table(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
+{
+    p2m_lock(p2m);
+    p2m_flush_table_locked(p2m);
     p2m_unlock(p2m);
 }
 
@@ -1776,6 +1779,26 @@ p2m_flush_nestedp2m(struct domain *d)
         p2m_flush_table(d->arch.nested_p2m[i]);
 }
 
+void np2m_flush_base(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long np2m_base)
+{
+    struct domain *d = v->domain;
+    struct p2m_domain *p2m;
+    unsigned int i;
+
+    np2m_base &= ~(0xfffull);
+
+    nestedp2m_lock(d);
+    for ( i = 0; i < MAX_NESTEDP2M; i++ )
+    {
+        p2m = d->arch.nested_p2m[i];
+        p2m_lock(p2m);
+        if ( p2m->np2m_base == np2m_base )
+            p2m_flush_table_locked(p2m);
+        p2m_unlock(p2m);
+    }
+    nestedp2m_unlock(d);
+}
+
 static void assign_np2m(struct vcpu *v, struct p2m_domain *p2m)
 {
     struct nestedvcpu *nv = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
index 78f51a6ce6..5501ccc455 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
@@ -779,6 +779,8 @@ int p2m_pt_handle_deferred_changes(uint64_t gpa);
 void p2m_flush(struct vcpu *v, struct p2m_domain *p2m);
 /* Flushes all nested p2m tables */
 void p2m_flush_nestedp2m(struct domain *d);
+/* Flushes all np2m objects with the specified np2m_base */
+void np2m_flush_base(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long np2m_base);
 
 void nestedp2m_write_p2m_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m, unsigned long gfn,
     l1_pgentry_t *p, l1_pgentry_t new, unsigned int level);
-- 
2.14.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-29 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-29 15:01 [PATCH 1/9] x86/np2m: refactor p2m_get_nestedp2m() George Dunlap
2017-09-29 15:01 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2017-10-02  9:37   ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/np2m: Have invept flush all np2m entries with the same base pointer Sergey Dyasli
2017-10-02  9:40     ` George Dunlap
2017-10-02 10:07       ` George Dunlap
2017-10-02 10:24         ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/np2m: remove np2m_base from p2m_get_nestedp2m() George Dunlap
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/np2m: Simplify nestedhvm_hap_nested_page_fault George Dunlap
2017-10-02  9:39   ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/vvmx: Make updating shadow EPTP value more efficient George Dunlap
2017-09-29 15:56   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-10-02  9:41     ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/np2m: Send flush IPIs only when a vcpu is actively using a shadow p2m George Dunlap
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/np2m: implement sharing of np2m between vCPUs George Dunlap
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/np2m: refactor p2m_get_nestedp2m_locked() George Dunlap
2017-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/np2m: add break to np2m_flush_eptp() George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170929150144.7602-2-george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).