xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Bhupinder Thakur <bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/27 v12] arm/xen: vpl011: Fix the slow early console SBSA UART output
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:03:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017140302.GN20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017134429.GV19485@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:44:29PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> arch/arm/kernel/debug.S:
> 
> ENTRY(printascii)
>                 addruart_current r3, r1, r2
>                 b       2f
> 1:              waituart r2, r3
>                 senduart r1, r3
>                 busyuart r2, r3
>                 teq     r1, #'\n'
>                 moveq   r1, #'\r'
>                 beq     1b
> 2:              teq     r0, #0
>                 ldrneb  r1, [r0], #1
>                 teqne   r1, #0
>                 bne     1b
>                 ret     lr
> ENDPROC(printascii)
> 
> ENTRY(printch)
>                 addruart_current r3, r1, r2
>                 mov     r1, r0
>                 mov     r0, #0
>                 b       1b
> ENDPROC(printch)
> 
> 
> 
> Russell, do you know why we wait for the UART transmitter to go
> completely idle before queueing a new char?

It's the only way the /debug/ (and I stress /debug/) functions know
that the character has actually been sent before allowing control to
continue.  This is important for early-crashy-debug situations, but
probably less so for early_printk.

> For an individual printch this can makes sense, but it also introduces
> delay for every char in printascii.
> 
> This seems to interact interestingly with virtualised UARTs, because we
> may thrash between the guest and hypervisor per-char, though there
> may be a way to reduce the impact of this on the emulation side.

Well, I guess re-using the early /debugging/ code for early printk is
showing more and more issues - and reusing this code in this way is
something that I've never really been a fan of.

I'd personally like to see the coupling between the two things gone -
I never really wanted that coupling in the first place.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-17 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-13 10:40 [PATCH 26/27 v12] arm/xen: vpl011: Fix the slow early console SBSA UART output Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-13 10:40 ` [PATCH 27/27 v12] arm/xen: vpl011: Correct the logic for asserting/de-asserting SBSA UART TX interrupt Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-13 13:59   ` Dave Martin
2017-10-18 10:26   ` Andre Przywara
2017-10-18 10:47     ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-18 13:41     ` [PATCH RFC] ARM: vPL011: use receive timeout interrupt Andre Przywara
2017-10-18 16:32       ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-23 16:01         ` Andre Przywara
2017-10-24 11:00           ` Julien Grall
2017-10-24 11:27             ` Andre Przywara
2017-10-24 12:56               ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-24 12:56           ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-17  9:51 ` [PATCH 26/27 v12] arm/xen: vpl011: Fix the slow early console SBSA UART output Andre Przywara
2017-10-17 11:19   ` Dave Martin
2017-10-17 12:53     ` Rob Herring
2017-10-17 13:44       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-17 14:03         ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-10-17 14:49           ` Dave P Martin
2017-10-18 10:17   ` Bhupinder Thakur
2017-10-18 10:31     ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171017140302.GN20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).