xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: sstabellini@kernel.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com,
	jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 14/16] rbtree: handle 1-child recoloring in rb_erase() instead of rb_erase_color()
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:50:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171121152009.15591-15-kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171121152009.15591-1-kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>

From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>

An interesting observation for rb_erase() is that when a node has
exactly one child, the node must be black and the child must be red.
An interesting consequence is that removing such a node can be done by
simply replacing it with its child and making the child black,
which we can do efficiently in rb_erase(). __rb_erase_color() then
only needs to handle the no-childs case and can be modified accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[Linux commit 46b6135a7402ac23c5b25f2bd79b03bab8f98278]

Ported to Xen.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
---
Removed new line from previous patch to make inline with Linux code base
---
 xen/common/rbtree.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/rbtree.c b/xen/common/rbtree.c
index 13a622326d..e7df273800 100644
--- a/xen/common/rbtree.c
+++ b/xen/common/rbtree.c
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
   Red Black Trees
   (C) 1999  Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
   (C) 2002  David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-  
+  (C) 2012  Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
+
   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
@@ -50,6 +51,11 @@
 #define rb_is_red(r)   (!rb_color(r))
 #define rb_is_black(r) rb_color(r)
 
+static inline void rb_set_black(struct rb_node *rb)
+{
+	rb->__rb_parent_color |= RB_BLACK;
+}
+
 static inline void rb_set_parent(struct rb_node *rb, struct rb_node *p)
 {
 	rb->__rb_parent_color = rb_color(rb) | (unsigned long)p;
@@ -214,27 +220,18 @@ void rb_insert_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_insert_color);
 
-static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
-			     struct rb_root *root)
+static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *parent, struct rb_root *root)
 {
-	struct rb_node *sibling, *tmp1, *tmp2;
+	struct rb_node *node = NULL, *sibling, *tmp1, *tmp2;
 
 	while (true) {
 		/*
-		 * Loop invariant: all leaf paths going through node have a
-		 * black node count that is 1 lower than other leaf paths.
-		 *
-		 * If node is red, we can flip it to black to adjust.
-		 * If node is the root, all leaf paths go through it.
-		 * Otherwise, we need to adjust the tree through color flips
-		 * and tree rotations as per one of the 4 cases below.
+		 * Loop invariants:
+		 * - node is black (or NULL on first iteration)
+		 * - node is not the root (parent is not NULL)
+		 * - All leaf paths going through parent and node have a
+		 *   black node count that is 1 lower than other leaf paths.
 		 */
-		if (node && rb_is_red(node)) {
-			rb_set_parent_color(node, parent, RB_BLACK);
-			break;
-		} else if (!parent) {
-			break;
-		}
 		sibling = parent->rb_right;
 		if (node != sibling) {  /* node == parent->rb_left */
 			if (rb_is_red(sibling)) {
@@ -268,17 +265,22 @@ static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
 					*      / \           / \
 					*     Sl  Sr        Sl  Sr
 					*
-					* This leaves us violating 5), so
-					* recurse at p. If p is red, the
-					* recursion will just flip it to black
-					* and exit. If coming from Case 1,
-					* p is known to be red.
+					* This leaves us violating 5) which
+					* can be fixed by flipping p to black
+					* if it was red, or by recursing at p.
+					* p is red when coming from Case 1.
 					*/
 					rb_set_parent_color(sibling, parent,
 							    RB_RED);
-					node = parent;
-					parent = rb_parent(node);
-					continue;
+					if (rb_is_red(parent))
+						rb_set_black(parent);
+					else {
+						node = parent;
+						parent = rb_parent(node);
+						if (parent)
+							continue;
+					}
+					break;
 				}
 				/*
 				 * Case 3 - right rotate at sibling
@@ -339,9 +341,15 @@ static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
 					/* Case 2 - sibling color flip */
 					rb_set_parent_color(sibling, parent,
 							    RB_RED);
-					node = parent;
-					parent = rb_parent(node);
-					continue;
+					if (rb_is_red(parent))
+						rb_set_black(parent);
+					else {
+						node = parent;
+						parent = rb_parent(node);
+						if (parent)
+							continue;
+					}
+					break;
 				}
 				/* Case 3 - right rotate at sibling */
 				sibling->rb_right = tmp1 = tmp2->rb_left;
@@ -369,23 +377,31 @@ static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
 void rb_erase(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
 {
 	struct rb_node *child = node->rb_right, *tmp = node->rb_left;
-	struct rb_node *parent;
-	int color;
+	struct rb_node *parent, *rebalance;
 
 	if (!tmp) {
-	case1:
-		/* Case 1: node to erase has no more than 1 child (easy!) */
+		/*
+		 * Case 1: node to erase has no more than 1 child (easy!)
+		 *
+		 * Note that if there is one child it must be red due to 5)
+		 * and node must be black due to 4). We adjust colors locally
+		 * so as to bypass __rb_erase_color() later on.
+		 */
 
 		parent = rb_parent(node);
-		color = rb_color(node);
-
-		if (child)
-			rb_set_parent(child, parent);
 		__rb_change_child(node, child, parent, root);
+		if (child) {
+			rb_set_parent_color(child, parent, RB_BLACK);
+			rebalance = NULL;
+		} else {
+			rebalance = rb_is_black(node) ? parent : NULL;
+		}
 	} else if (!child) {
 		/* Still case 1, but this time the child is node->rb_left */
-		child = tmp;
-		goto case1;
+		parent = rb_parent(node);
+		__rb_change_child(node, tmp, parent, root);
+		rb_set_parent_color(tmp, parent, RB_BLACK);
+		rebalance = NULL;
 	} else {
 		struct rb_node *old = node, *left;
 
@@ -397,26 +413,29 @@ void rb_erase(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root)
 
 		child = node->rb_right;
 		parent = rb_parent(node);
-		color = rb_color(node);
 
 		if (parent == old) {
 			parent = node;
 		} else {
-			if (child)
-				rb_set_parent(child, parent);
 			parent->rb_left = child;
 
 			node->rb_right = old->rb_right;
 			rb_set_parent(old->rb_right, node);
 		}
 
+		if (child) {
+			rb_set_parent_color(child, parent, RB_BLACK);
+			rebalance = NULL;
+		} else {
+			rebalance = rb_is_black(node) ? parent : NULL;
+		}
 		node->__rb_parent_color = old->__rb_parent_color;
 		node->rb_left = old->rb_left;
 		rb_set_parent(old->rb_left, node);
 	}
 
-	if (color == RB_BLACK)
-		__rb_erase_color(child, parent, root);
+	if (rebalance)
+		__rb_erase_color(rebalance, root);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_erase);
 
-- 
2.13.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-21 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-21 15:19 [PATCH v6 00/16] xen: common: rbtree: ported updates from Linux tree Praveen Kumar
2017-11-21 15:19 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] rbtree: remove redundant if()-condition in rb_erase() Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:39   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:19 ` [PATCH v6 02/16 RESEND] rbtree: empty nodes have no color Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:43   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:19 ` [PATCH v6 03/16 RESEND] rbtree: move some implementation details from rbtree.h to rbtree.c Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:46   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:19 ` [PATCH v6 04/16 RESEND] rbtree: break out of rb_insert_color loop after tree rotation Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:49   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:19 ` [PATCH v6 05/16 RESEND] rbtree: adjust root color in rb_insert_color() only when necessary Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:51   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:19 ` [PATCH v6 06/16 RESEND] rbtree: low level optimizations in rb_insert_color() Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:52   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 07/16 RESEND] rbtree: adjust node color in __rb_erase_color() only when necessary Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:55   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 08/16 RESEND] rbtree: optimize case selection logic in __rb_erase_color() Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:57   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 09/16 RESEND] rbtree: low level optimizations " Praveen Kumar
2017-12-20 16:59   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 10/16 RESEND] rbtree: coding style adjustments Praveen Kumar
2018-01-03 11:26   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 11/16 RESEND] rbtree: optimize fetching of sibling node Praveen Kumar
2018-01-03 11:29   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 12/16 RESEND] rbtree: add __rb_change_child() helper function Praveen Kumar
2018-01-03 11:30   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 13/16 RESEND] rbtree: place easiest case first in rb_erase() Praveen Kumar
2018-01-03 11:32   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` Praveen Kumar [this message]
2018-01-03 11:35   ` [PATCH v6 14/16] rbtree: handle 1-child recoloring in rb_erase() instead of rb_erase_color() Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 15/16 RESEND] rbtree: low level optimizations in rb_erase() Praveen Kumar
2018-01-03 11:37   ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v6 16/16 RESEND] rbtree: fix typo in comment of rb_insert_color Praveen Kumar
2018-01-03 11:38   ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-05 16:19 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] xen: common: rbtree: ported updates from Linux tree Praveen Kumar
2017-12-07 15:32   ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171121152009.15591-15-kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --to=kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).