From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: do not fail device removal if backend domain is gone
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:32:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180209163247.GQ2070@mail-itl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180209153340.2n6xg7okbgg2umyq@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1782 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:33:40PM +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> I'm sorry, I'm a little foggy today. Does this mean the call to
> libxl__xs_path_cleanup is simply not needed in
> libxl__initiate_device_generic_remove?
It is, it's an alternative to setting be/state=XenbusStateClosing, when
frontend is unresponsive. To let the backend know that frontend is gone,
so it can set be/state=XenbusStateClosed.
We have various cases (not comprehensive list):
- both frontend and backend operational: after setting
be/state=XenbusStateClosing backend wait for frontend confirmation
and respond with be/state=XenbusStateClosed; then libxl in dom0
remove frontend entries and libxl in backend domain (which may be the
same) remove backend entries
- unresponsive backend/frontend: after a timeout, force=1 is used to remove
frontend entries, instead of just setting
be/state=XenbusStateClosing; then wait for be/state=XenbusStateClosed.
If that timeout too, remove both frontend and backend entries
- backend gone, with this patch: no place for setting/waiting on
be/state - go directly to removing frontend entries, without waiting
for be/state=XenbusStateClosed (this is the difference vs force=1)
Without this patch the end result is similar, both frontend and backend
entries are removed, but in case of backend gone:
- libxl waits for be/state=XenbusStateClosed (and obviously timeout)
- return value from the function signal an error, which for example
confuse libvirt - it thinks the device remove failed, so is still
there
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-08 23:22 [PATCH] libxl: do not fail device removal if backend domain is gone Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2018-02-09 11:27 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-09 11:41 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2018-02-09 12:10 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-09 13:08 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2018-02-09 14:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-09 15:11 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2018-02-09 15:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-09 16:32 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki [this message]
2018-02-09 16:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-02-23 18:51 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180209163247.GQ2070@mail-itl \
--to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).