From: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-4.11] x86/pv: Hide more EFER bits from PV guests
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 11:21:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507162038.GA32212@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525687223-4060-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> We don't advertise SVM in CPUID so a PV guest shouldn't be under the
> impression that it can use SVM functionality, but despite this, it really
> shouldn't see SVME set when reading EFER.
>
> On Intel processors, 32bit PV guests don't see, and can't use SYSCALL.
>
> Introduce EFER_KNOWN_MASK to whitelist the features Xen knows about, and use
> this to clamp the guests view.
>
> Take the opportunity to reuse the mask to simplify svm_vmcb_isvalid(), and
> change "undefined" to "unknown" in the print message, as there is at least
> EFER.TCE (Translation Cache Extension) defined but unknown to Xen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Release-acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> CC: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
>
> Arguably, this wants backporting to the stable trees, so should be considered
> for 4.11 at this point.
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svmdebug.c | 5 ++---
> xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c | 11 +++++++++--
> xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svmdebug.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svmdebug.c
> index 6c215d1..d35e405 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svmdebug.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svmdebug.c
> @@ -133,9 +133,8 @@ bool svm_vmcb_isvalid(const char *from, const struct vmcb_struct *vmcb,
> PRINTF("DR7: bits [63:32] are not zero (%#"PRIx64")\n",
> vmcb_get_dr7(vmcb));
>
> - if ( efer & ~(EFER_SCE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA | EFER_NX | EFER_SVME |
> - EFER_LMSLE | EFER_FFXSE) )
> - PRINTF("EFER: undefined bits are not zero (%#"PRIx64")\n", efer);
> + if ( efer & ~EFER_KNOWN_MASK )
> + PRINTF("EFER: unknown bits are not zero (%#"PRIx64")\n", efer);
>
> if ( hvm_efer_valid(v, efer, -1) )
> PRINTF("EFER: %s (%"PRIx64")\n", hvm_efer_valid(v, efer, -1), efer);
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c
> index 15f42b3..ce2ec76 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c
> @@ -867,9 +867,16 @@ static int read_msr(unsigned int reg, uint64_t *val,
> return X86EMUL_OKAY;
>
> case MSR_EFER:
> - *val = read_efer();
> + /* Hide unknown bits, and unconditionally hide SVME from guests. */
> + *val = read_efer() & EFER_KNOWN_MASK & ~EFER_SVME;
> + /*
> + * Hide the 64-bit features from 32-bit guests. SCE has
> + * vendor-dependent behaviour.
> + */
> if ( is_pv_32bit_domain(currd) )
> - *val &= ~(EFER_LME | EFER_LMA | EFER_LMSLE);
> + *val &= ~(EFER_LME | EFER_LMA | EFER_LMSLE |
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL
> + ? EFER_SCE : 0));
> return X86EMUL_OKAY;
>
> case MSR_K7_FID_VID_CTL:
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h
> index c9f44eb..6d94d65 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
> #define EFER_LMSLE (1<<_EFER_LMSLE)
> #define EFER_FFXSE (1<<_EFER_FFXSE)
>
> +#define EFER_KNOWN_MASK (EFER_SCE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA | EFER_NX | \
> + EFER_SVME | EFER_LMSLE | EFER_FFXSE)
> +
> /* Speculation Controls. */
> #define MSR_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
> #define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS (_AC(1, ULL) << 0)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
Reviewed-by: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
--
Brian Woods
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 10:00 [PATCH v2 for-4.11] x86/pv: Hide more EFER bits from PV guests Andrew Cooper
2018-05-07 10:43 ` Jan Beulich
2018-05-07 10:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-05-07 16:21 ` Brian Woods [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180507162038.GA32212@amd.com \
--to=brian.woods@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).