From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Marczykowski Subject: Re: Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 18:19:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20180518161925.GE11683@mail-itl> References: <20180516215425.GB11683@mail-itl> <23293.29942.645249.704280@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20180517145922.GA20125@mail-itl> <23293.39881.793095.966171@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20180518153344.GC11683@mail-itl> <5AFEF73D02000078001C425D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7122949990424284750==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5AFEF73D02000078001C425D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jan Beulich Cc: Simon Gaiser , Ian Jackson , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7122949990424284750== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc" Content-Disposition: inline --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 18.05.18 at 17:33, wrote: > > Yes, I'm happy to help with that. As I've said, the basic test is very > > simple (rtcwake command) and already very useful. The fact that it is(?) > > broken on staging doesn't make it easier, >=20 > Details on the breakage would be appreciated (on a separate thread), > unless you plan to address it yourself. I recall Simon(?) mentioning this= as > well, but also not providing sufficient data to consider looking into it > (perhaps simply because it wasn't easy to obtain useful data, as > frequently is the case with S3 resume). I think it would be nice if we co= uld > release 4.11 without a regression here. I only know that Simon have tested it and it fails. Cc'ing him. --=20 Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhrpukzGPukRmQqkK24/THMrX1ywFAlr+/Q0ACgkQ24/THMrX 1ywK4AgAjv9AQRH/Xnju1PpBJNnA+LN1pjE/mxDTeYgqef9wTyUfDHbxvetIkaHi bkf+ZPpbvqu70Q7Gfz9CdrmCzY1+lFOZunHPJBibLNRbDwcMs6BfPcdPvmHacs3t wkd7LmTuNxznIHqukHOV4radGqzGgI3oO51KK2KBq1xOBAIrh9d+QNDaVxZtJJhO +KSWUvnDcT3dxkwMIgS0HWxy+sFGY+equmNTeDFCIVe3OH+CSX6cDpM4Gd6EcbBW aYnn4jMFILatQw3DpwGMOGDrGLjkqLF1zhrDuei37aZZ//zWurJ1C2lXQ4Pa5Vpq lTH7wE7DZsmT1oHjvl+nyow2pG24Xg== =ZjrU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc-- --===============7122949990424284750== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVucHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0 cy54ZW5wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hlbi1kZXZlbA== --===============7122949990424284750==--