From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Matt Leinhos <matthew.leinhos@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.11.1: gdbsx fails - stable backport request
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 23:07:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190406210706.GA1343@mail-itl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLDOk90XmXO+HF5evXqHNO48-pckHphNRpoMemx0u4L9NFMQQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:48:16PM -0500, Matt Leinhos wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I've encountered a problem running gdb + gdbsx on Xen 4.11.1, running Linux
> kernel 4.18.0-15 on Ubuntu 18.04. Pertinent info is below.
>
> I've observed this behavior with gdb 8.0, 8.1.1 and 8.2. I've also seen it
> on Xen 4.9.2. In short, something is broken with my system, but I don't
> know how to investigate.
(...)
> Truncated register 26 in remote 'g' packet
This is already fixed in Xen 4.12:
https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=0c9821d5c870c35aa38df7bb5e2ff54da2169b5b
I'm proposing this for a backport to stable branches:
0c9821d5c8 tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests
It may also be reasonable to backport other gdbsx related commits.
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Matt Leinhos <matthew.leinhos@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.11.1: gdbsx fails - stable backport request
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 23:07:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190406210706.GA1343@mail-itl> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190406210706.fB910uEHdwiUXEbawj_AsmP0l7ILFQjR5PElYHpUa6A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLDOk90XmXO+HF5evXqHNO48-pckHphNRpoMemx0u4L9NFMQQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:48:16PM -0500, Matt Leinhos wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I've encountered a problem running gdb + gdbsx on Xen 4.11.1, running Linux
> kernel 4.18.0-15 on Ubuntu 18.04. Pertinent info is below.
>
> I've observed this behavior with gdb 8.0, 8.1.1 and 8.2. I've also seen it
> on Xen 4.9.2. In short, something is broken with my system, but I don't
> know how to investigate.
(...)
> Truncated register 26 in remote 'g' packet
This is already fixed in Xen 4.12:
https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=0c9821d5c870c35aa38df7bb5e2ff54da2169b5b
I'm proposing this for a backport to stable branches:
0c9821d5c8 tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests
It may also be reasonable to backport other gdbsx related commits.
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-06 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 21:48 Xen 4.11.1: gdbsx fails Matt Leinhos
2019-04-05 21:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Leinhos
2019-04-06 21:00 ` Matt Leinhos
2019-04-06 21:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Leinhos
2019-04-06 21:07 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki [this message]
2019-04-06 21:07 ` [Xen-devel] Xen 4.11.1: gdbsx fails - stable backport request Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190406210706.GA1343@mail-itl \
--to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=matthew.leinhos@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).