From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03 of 10 [RFC]] libxc, libxl: Introduce xc_nodemap_t and libxl_nodemap
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:17:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2077d51764e0ff1e33a9.1334150270@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1334150267@Solace>
Exactly as we have xc_cpumap_t, something similar for representing
NUMA nodes (i.e., xc_nodemap_t and nodemap_t) could be useful. The
same applies to libxl_cpumap, which on its turn now has its
node-related counterpart, libxl_nodemap.
This is all in preparation for making it possible explicit
specification of the `node affinity` of a guest.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_misc.c b/tools/libxc/xc_misc.c
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_misc.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_misc.c
@@ -35,21 +35,49 @@ int xc_get_max_cpus(xc_interface *xch)
return max_cpus;
}
+int xc_get_max_nodes(xc_interface *xch)
+{
+ static int max_nodes = 0;
+ xc_physinfo_t physinfo;
+
+ if ( max_nodes )
+ return max_nodes;
+
+ if ( !xc_physinfo(xch, &physinfo) )
+ max_nodes = physinfo.max_node_id + 1;
+
+ return max_nodes;
+}
+
int xc_get_cpumap_size(xc_interface *xch)
{
return (xc_get_max_cpus(xch) + 7) / 8;
}
-xc_cpumap_t xc_cpumap_alloc(xc_interface *xch)
+int xc_get_nodemap_size(xc_interface *xch)
{
- int sz;
+ return (xc_get_max_nodes(xch) + 7) / 8;
+}
- sz = xc_get_cpumap_size(xch);
+/* XXX See [*] below ... */
+static xc_cpumap_t __xc_map_alloc(xc_interface *xch, int sz)
+{
if (sz == 0)
return NULL;
return calloc(1, sz);
}
+xc_cpumap_t xc_cpumap_alloc(xc_interface *xch)
+{
+ return __xc_map_alloc(xch, xc_get_cpumap_size(xch));
+}
+
+xc_nodemap_t xc_nodemap_alloc(xc_interface *xch)
+{
+ /* XXX [*] How bad is this? Ideas? */
+ return (xc_nodemap_t) __xc_map_alloc(xch, xc_get_nodemap_size(xch));
+}
+
int xc_readconsolering(xc_interface *xch,
char *buffer,
unsigned int *pnr_chars,
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h b/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
--- a/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
@@ -330,6 +330,20 @@ int xc_get_cpumap_size(xc_interface *xch
xc_cpumap_t xc_cpumap_alloc(xc_interface *xch);
/*
+ * NODEMAP handling
+ */
+typedef uint8_t *xc_nodemap_t;
+
+/* return maximum number of NUMA nodes the hypervisor supports */
+int xc_get_max_nodes(xc_interface *xch);
+
+/* return array size for nodemap */
+int xc_get_nodemap_size(xc_interface *xch);
+
+/* allocate a nodemap */
+xc_nodemap_t xc_nodemap_alloc(xc_interface *xch);
+
+/*
* DOMAIN DEBUGGING FUNCTIONS
*/
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c
@@ -486,11 +486,27 @@ int libxl_cpumap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, l
return libxl_map_alloc(ctx, cpumap, max_cpus);
}
+int libxl_nodemap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_nodemap *nodemap)
+{
+ int max_nodes;
+
+ max_nodes = libxl_get_max_nodes(ctx);
+ if (max_nodes == 0)
+ return ERROR_FAIL;
+
+ return libxl_map_alloc(ctx, nodemap, max_nodes);
+}
+
int libxl_get_max_cpus(libxl_ctx *ctx)
{
return xc_get_max_cpus(ctx->xch);
}
+int libxl_get_max_nodes(libxl_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ return xc_get_max_nodes(ctx->xch);
+}
+
int libxl__enum_from_string(const libxl_enum_string_table *t,
const char *s, int *e)
{
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h
@@ -109,6 +109,35 @@ static inline int libxl_cpumap_cpu_valid
#define libxl_for_each_set_cpu(v, m) for (v = 0; v < (m).size * 8; v++) \
if (libxl_cpumap_test(&(m), v))
+int libxl_nodemap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_nodemap *nodemap);
+static inline int libxl_nodemap_test(libxl_nodemap *nodemap, int node)
+{
+ return libxl_map_test(nodemap, node);
+}
+static inline void libxl_nodemap_set(libxl_nodemap *nodemap, int node)
+{
+ libxl_map_set(nodemap, node);
+}
+static inline void libxl_nodemap_reset(libxl_nodemap *nodemap, int node)
+{
+ libxl_map_reset(nodemap, node);
+}
+static inline void libxl_nodemap_set_any(libxl_nodemap *nodemap)
+{
+ libxl_map_set_any(nodemap);
+}
+static inline void libxl_nodemap_set_none(libxl_nodemap *nodemap)
+{
+ libxl_map_set_none(nodemap);
+}
+static inline int libxl_nodemap_node_valid(libxl_nodemap *nodemap, int node)
+{
+ return libxl_map_elem_valid(nodemap, node);
+}
+#define libxl_for_each_node(var, map) for (var = 0; var < (map).size * 8; var++)
+#define libxl_for_each_set_node(v, m) for (v = 0; v < (m).size * 8; v++) \
+ if (libxl_nodemap_test(&(m), v))
+
static inline uint32_t libxl__sizekb_to_mb(uint32_t s) {
return (s + 1023) / 1024;
}
diff --git a/xen/common/domctl.c b/xen/common/domctl.c
--- a/xen/common/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
@@ -116,6 +116,14 @@ int xenctl_cpumap_to_cpumask(cpumask_var
return err;
}
+int xenctl_nodemap_to_nodemask(nodemask_t *nodemask,
+ const struct xenctl_map *xenctl_nodemap)
+{
+ return xenctl_map_to_bitmap(nodes_addr(*nodemask),
+ xenctl_nodemap,
+ MAX_NUMNODES);
+}
+
static inline int is_free_domid(domid_t dom)
{
struct domain *d;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 13:17 [PATCH 00 of 10 [RFC]] Automatically place guest on host's NUMA nodes with xl Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 01 of 10 [RFC]] libxc: Generalize xenctl_cpumap to just xenctl_map Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 16:08 ` George Dunlap
2012-04-11 16:31 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 16:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 02 of 10 [RFC]] libxl: Generalize libxl_cpumap to just libxl_map Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-04-11 16:38 ` [PATCH 03 of 10 [RFC]] libxc, libxl: Introduce xc_nodemap_t and libxl_nodemap George Dunlap
2012-04-11 16:57 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 04 of 10 [RFC]] libxl: Introduce libxl_get_numainfo() calling xc_numainfo() Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 05 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Explicit node affinity specification for guests via config file Dario Faggioli
2012-04-12 10:24 ` George Dunlap
2012-04-12 10:48 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-12 22:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-12 11:32 ` Formatting of emails which are comments on patches Ian Jackson
2012-04-12 11:42 ` George Dunlap
2012-04-12 22:21 ` [PATCH 05 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Explicit node affinity specification for guests via config file Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 06 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Allow user to set or change node affinity on-line Dario Faggioli
2012-04-12 10:29 ` George Dunlap
2012-04-12 21:57 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 07 of 10 [RFC]] sched_credit: Let the scheduler know about `node affinity` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-12 23:06 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-27 14:45 ` George Dunlap
2012-05-02 15:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 08 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Introduce First Fit memory-wise placement of guests on nodes Dario Faggioli
2012-05-01 15:45 ` George Dunlap
2012-05-02 16:30 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-03 1:03 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-05-03 8:10 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-03 10:16 ` George Dunlap
2012-05-03 13:41 ` George Dunlap
2012-05-03 14:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 09 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Introduce Best and Worst Fit guest placement algorithms Dario Faggioli
2012-04-16 10:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-11 13:17 ` [PATCH 10 of 10 [RFC]] xl: Some automatic NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-04-12 9:11 ` Ian Campbell
2012-04-12 10:32 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2077d51764e0ff1e33a9.1334150270@Solace \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).